Shane Timmons

25 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Shane Timmons
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Modeling and Simulation 92
  • Applied Psychology 73
  • Clinical Psychology 169
  • Health 54
  • General Decision Sciences 10
Replace Dylan Pieper with:
Dylan Pieper United States
Andrés Dávila France
Munqith Dagher United States
Nejc Plohl Slovenia
Ekmel Geçer Türkiye
Féidhlim McGowan Ireland
Bojan Musil Slovenia
Yoshihiko Kadoya Japan
Wang Liao United States
Shane Timmons relative to Dylan Pieper United States Dylan Pieper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Dylan Pieper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shane Timmons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shane Timmons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shane Timmons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shane Timmons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shane Timmons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shane Timmons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shane Timmons. The network helps show where Shane Timmons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Shane Timmons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shane Timmons Line = papers co-authored together Shane Timmons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020199
2 2020105
3 201829
4 202025
5 202018
6 202211
7 201810
8 20238
9 20208
10 20247
11 20197
12 20246
13 20225
14 20253
15 20233
16 20233
17 20193
18
Using behavioural science tohelp fight the coronavirus. ESRI Working Paper No. 656March 2020
20203
19 20233
20
Motivating social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An online experiment. ESRI Working Paper No. 658 April 2020
20202

About Shane Timmons

Shane Timmons is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (92 citations), Applied Psychology (73 citations), Clinical Psychology (169 citations), Health (54 citations) and General Decision Sciences (10 citations). Shane Timmons has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pete Lunn, Cameron Belton, Ciarán Lavin, Féidhlim McGowan, Deirdre A. Robertson, Martina Barjaková, Ruth M. J. Byrne, Frances McGinnity, Áine Ní Choisdealbha and Ylva Andersson. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Scientific Reports, Psychology and Health and The Journal of Positive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact