Shaina Tanguay-Colucci

437 total citations
16 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Shaina Tanguay-Colucci is a scholar working on Food Science, Molecular Biology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Shaina Tanguay-Colucci has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Food Science, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Shaina Tanguay-Colucci's work include Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (4 papers), Hibiscus Plant Research Studies (2 papers) and Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (2 papers). Shaina Tanguay-Colucci is often cited by papers focused on Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (4 papers), Hibiscus Plant Research Studies (2 papers) and Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (2 papers). Shaina Tanguay-Colucci collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Shaina Tanguay-Colucci's co-authors include Catherine Ulbricht, Wendy Weissner, Nicole Giese, Ethan Basch, Dawn Costa, Richard Isaac, David Sollars, Ivo Foppa, Paul Hammerness and Erica Rusie and has published in prestigious journals such as Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, Journal of Dietary Supplements and Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy.

In The Last Decade

Shaina Tanguay-Colucci

15 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shaina Tanguay-Colucci United States 11 115 85 64 64 57 16 318
R. Rajesh India 13 123 1.1× 95 1.1× 72 1.1× 73 1.1× 91 1.6× 45 365
Sudesh N. Gaidhani India 13 86 0.7× 143 1.7× 94 1.5× 82 1.3× 63 1.1× 47 415
Regina C. Windsor United States 11 90 0.8× 80 0.9× 82 1.3× 75 1.2× 43 0.8× 19 389
Ashok Vaidya India 10 142 1.2× 125 1.5× 86 1.3× 92 1.4× 72 1.3× 37 451
Mukesh Singh Sikarwar India 11 113 1.0× 63 0.7× 103 1.6× 68 1.1× 133 2.3× 33 398
Rafieian Mahmoud Iran 11 138 1.2× 82 1.0× 59 0.9× 52 0.8× 89 1.6× 32 434
D. D. Bandawane India 9 136 1.2× 79 0.9× 44 0.7× 85 1.3× 76 1.3× 28 340
Funmilayo D. Onajobi Nigeria 11 112 1.0× 61 0.7× 76 1.2× 65 1.0× 59 1.0× 31 348
Samuel O. Onoja Nigeria 10 142 1.2× 56 0.7× 59 0.9× 72 1.1× 101 1.8× 48 329
Monika Sabharwal India 4 95 0.8× 107 1.3× 88 1.4× 70 1.1× 27 0.5× 6 368

Countries citing papers authored by Shaina Tanguay-Colucci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaina Tanguay-Colucci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaina Tanguay-Colucci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaina Tanguay-Colucci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaina Tanguay-Colucci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaina Tanguay-Colucci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaina Tanguay-Colucci. The network helps show where Shaina Tanguay-Colucci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shaina Tanguay-Colucci

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shaina Tanguay-Colucci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shaina Tanguay-Colucci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shaina Tanguay-Colucci. Shaina Tanguay-Colucci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Nicole Giese, Richard Isaac, et al.. (2014). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Chlorophyll by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 11(2). 198–239. 16 indexed citations
2.
Conquer, Julie, Dawn Costa, Nicole Giese, et al.. (2013). Cordyceps ( Cordyceps spp.): An Evidence-Based Systematic Review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 19(6). 326–336. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Regina C. Windsor, Julie Conquer, et al.. (2012). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Annatto ( Bixa orellana L.) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 9(1). 57–77. 27 indexed citations
4.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Dawn Costa, Nicole Giese, et al.. (2012). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Acai (Euterpe oleracea) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 9(2). 128–147. 15 indexed citations
5.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Regina C. Windsor, Dawn Costa, et al.. (2011). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Cinnamon ( Cinnamomum spp.) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 8(4). 378–454. 34 indexed citations
6.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Wendy Chao, Shaina Tanguay-Colucci, et al.. (2011). Probiotics ( Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Saccharomyces boulardii ): An Evidence-Based Systematic Review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 17(6). 334–348.
7.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Ethan Basch, Ivo Foppa, et al.. (2011). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Gymnema (Gymnema sylvestreR. Br.) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 8(3). 311–330. 10 indexed citations
8.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Julie Conquer, Dawn Costa, et al.. (2011). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Senna ( Cassia senna ) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 8(2). 189–238. 21 indexed citations
9.
Ulbricht, Catherine, et al.. (2010). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Amylase Inhibitors by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 7(1). 78–95. 4 indexed citations
10.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Ethan Basch, Steve Bent, et al.. (2009). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 6(2). 162–200. 21 indexed citations
11.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Wendy Chao, Erica Rusie, et al.. (2009). Chia (Salvia hispanica): A Systematic Review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials. 4(3). 168–174. 29 indexed citations
12.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Jennifer Armstrong, Ethan Basch, et al.. (2008). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review ofAloe veraby the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy. 7(3-4). 279–323. 55 indexed citations
13.
Ulbricht, Catherine, Ethan Basch, Edzard Ernst, et al.. (2008). Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecumL. Leguminosae): An Evidence-Based Systematic Review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy. 7(3-4). 143–177. 52 indexed citations
14.
Basch, Ethan, Nicole Giese, David Sollars, et al.. (2008). Natural Standard Professional Monograph. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 5(2). 117–146. 7 indexed citations
15.
Basch, Ethan, Heather Boon, Kelly Dowhower Karpa, et al.. (2008). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Passion Flower (Passiflora IncarnataL.) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 5(3). 310–340. 2 indexed citations
16.
Conquer, Julie, Dawn Costa, Nicole Giese, et al.. (2006). An Evidence-Based Systematic Review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026