S.F. Berry

494 total citations
12 papers, 266 citations indexed

About

S.F. Berry is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, S.F. Berry has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 266 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in S.F. Berry's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (11 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (5 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers). S.F. Berry is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (11 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (5 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers). S.F. Berry collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. S.F. Berry's co-authors include E. C. Cocking, J. B. Power, E.M. Frearson, P. K. Evans, Deepak Pental, K. C. Sink, David I. Dunstan, G. K. Patnaik and Nigel J. Kilby and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Scientia Horticulturae.

In The Last Decade

S.F. Berry

12 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.F. Berry United Kingdom 8 225 210 41 36 35 12 266
R.A. de Fossard Australia 10 217 1.0× 188 0.9× 34 0.8× 23 0.6× 61 1.7× 24 248
E. G. M. Meijer Netherlands 12 322 1.4× 306 1.5× 31 0.8× 60 1.7× 21 0.6× 19 357
Greg Nugent Australia 6 275 1.2× 264 1.3× 34 0.8× 57 1.6× 44 1.3× 7 316
M. Barghchi United Kingdom 10 245 1.1× 220 1.0× 14 0.3× 34 0.9× 42 1.2× 12 268
Thomas Geier Germany 13 333 1.5× 325 1.5× 57 1.4× 39 1.1× 33 0.9× 32 399
Indra S. Harry Canada 13 297 1.3× 243 1.2× 35 0.9× 20 0.6× 51 1.5× 21 335
Averil Chlyah Morocco 9 285 1.3× 269 1.3× 17 0.4× 32 0.9× 31 0.9× 18 318
N. N. Cherep Ukraine 8 250 1.1× 237 1.1× 24 0.6× 21 0.6× 19 0.5× 12 283
G. S. Hicks Canada 11 396 1.8× 346 1.6× 82 2.0× 42 1.2× 31 0.9× 29 434
Katsuo Ohyama China 8 227 1.0× 231 1.1× 10 0.2× 20 0.6× 23 0.7× 24 263

Countries citing papers authored by S.F. Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.F. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.F. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.F. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.F. Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.F. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.F. Berry. The network helps show where S.F. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.F. Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.F. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.F. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.F. Berry. S.F. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Dunstan, David I., et al.. (1994). ABA consumption in norway spruce (Picea abies) and white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryo cultures. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 30(3). 156–159. 6 indexed citations
3.
Berry, S.F., G. K. Patnaik, E. C. Cocking, & Deepak Pental. (1983). Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Nicotiana alata ‘Crimson Bedder’ for somatic hybridisation studies. Scientia Horticulturae. 20(3). 281–285. 1 indexed citations
4.
Berry, S.F., et al.. (1982). Regeneration of Plants From Protoplasts of Lactuca sativa L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie. 108(1). 31–38. 23 indexed citations
5.
Power, J. B., et al.. (1980). Somatic hybridization of sexually incompatible petunias: Petunia parodii, Petunia parviflora. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 57(1). 1–4. 44 indexed citations
6.
Power, J. B., et al.. (1979). Somatic hybrids between unilateral cross-incompatible Petunia species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 55(3-4). 97–99. 22 indexed citations
7.
Power, J. B. & S.F. Berry. (1979). Plant Regeneration from Protoplasts of Browallia viscosa. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie. 94(5). 469–471. 4 indexed citations
8.
Power, J. B., et al.. (1978). Somatic and sexual hybrids of Petunia hybrida and Petunia parodii. Journal of Heredity. 69(6). 373–376. 10 indexed citations
9.
Power, J. B., S.F. Berry, E.M. Frearson, & E. C. Cocking. (1977). Selection procedures for the production of inter-species somatic hybrids of Petunia hybrida and Petunia parodii I. Nutrient media and drug sensitivity complementation selection. Plant Science Letters. 10(1). 1–6. 18 indexed citations
10.
Power, J. B., et al.. (1976). Somatic hybridisation of Petunia hybrida and P. parodii. Nature. 263(5577). 500–502. 84 indexed citations
11.
Power, J. B., et al.. (1976). The isolation, culture and regeneration of leaf protoplasts in the genus Petunia. Plant Science Letters. 7(1). 51–55. 33 indexed citations
12.
Cocking, E. C., et al.. (1974). Naturally occurring differential drug sensitivities of cultured plant protoplasts. Plant Science Letters. 3(5). 341–350. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026