Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political
Countries citing papers authored by Seyla Benhabib
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Seyla Benhabib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seyla Benhabib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seyla Benhabib more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seyla Benhabib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seyla Benhabib. The network helps show where Seyla Benhabib may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seyla Benhabib
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seyla Benhabib.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seyla Benhabib based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Seyla Benhabib. Seyla Benhabib is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benhabib, Seyla, Jeremy Waldron, Bonnie Honig, Will Kymlicka, & Robert M. Post. (2008). Kosmopolitismus und Demokratie : eine Debatte. Campus eBooks.7 indexed citations
8.
Benhabib, Seyla. (2008). Parité: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism, and Women and Citizenship (review). Hypatia. 23(4). 220–225.3 indexed citations
9.
Benhabib, Seyla. (2008). Is there a human right to democracy? : beyond interventionism and indiffrence [i.e. indifference]. University Press of Kansas eBooks.1 indexed citations
Benhabib, Seyla. (1998). Hannah Arendt : die melancholische Denkerin der Moderne.9 indexed citations
12.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1998). Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance. 46(5).30 indexed citations
13.
d’Entrèves, Maurizio Passerin & Seyla Benhabib. (1997). Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity.77 indexed citations
14.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1996). Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).864 indexed citations breakdown →
Benhabib, Seyla. (1995). Selbst im Kontext : kommunikative Ethik im Spannungsfeld von Feminismus, Kommunitarismus und Postmoderne. Suhrkamp eBooks.17 indexed citations
17.
Benhabib, Seyla & Fred Dallmayr. (1990). The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 28(4). 465–469.121 indexed citations
18.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1989). In The Shadow Of Aristotle And Hegel: Communicative Ethics And Current Controversies In Practical Philosophy. The Philosophical Forum. 21(1).15 indexed citations
19.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1981). Rationality and Social Action: Critical Reflections on Weber's Methodological Writings. The Philosophical Forum. 12(4). 356–374.1 indexed citations
20.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1977). Natural right and Hegel : an essay in modern political philosophy. UMI Dissertation Information Service eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.