S.E. Ashley

560 total citations
9 papers, 456 citations indexed

About

S.E. Ashley is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, S.E. Ashley has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 456 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in S.E. Ashley's work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (2 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (2 papers). S.E. Ashley is often cited by papers focused on Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (2 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (2 papers). S.E. Ashley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. S.E. Ashley's co-authors include T.J. Powles, Mitch Dowsett, D. Craig Allred, Jian Chang, M.G. Ormerod, K. Priest, MC Nicolson, IE Smith, Jenny C. Chang and Andreas Makris and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

S.E. Ashley

9 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S.E. Ashley United Kingdom	8	279	145	145	118	66	9	456
Zora Nešković‐Konstantinović Serbia	14	419 1.5×	220 1.5×	144 1.0×	338 2.9×	123 1.9×	49	698
Sunil Verma Canada	13	343 1.2×	157 1.1×	111 0.8×	110 0.9×	47 0.7×	25	673
S. Seeber Germany	12	262 0.9×	162 1.1×	55 0.4×	158 1.3×	30 0.5×	55	445
R. Molife United Kingdom	11	291 1.0×	277 1.9×	162 1.1×	300 2.5×	35 0.5×	24	694
Sibylle Loibl Germany	11	304 1.1×	144 1.0×	214 1.5×	156 1.3×	55 0.8×	45	500
Anke Kleine-Tebbe Germany	13	266 1.0×	97 0.7×	190 1.3×	206 1.7×	33 0.5×	23	569
J. Lindtner Switzerland	11	471 1.7×	131 0.9×	302 2.1×	223 1.9×	91 1.4×	12	679
Christian Singer Austria	11	158 0.6×	70 0.5×	133 0.9×	146 1.2×	86 1.3×	18	439
Daniel Boehm Germany	11	197 0.7×	57 0.4×	120 0.8×	149 1.3×	30 0.5×	25	540
C. Chow United States	9	260 0.9×	60 0.4×	64 0.4×	167 1.4×	35 0.5×	11	434

Countries citing papers authored by S.E. Ashley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.E. Ashley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.E. Ashley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.E. Ashley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.E. Ashley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.E. Ashley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.E. Ashley. The network helps show where S.E. Ashley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.E. Ashley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.E. Ashley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.E. Ashley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.E. Ashley. S.E. Ashley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Chang, Jian, M.G. Ormerod, T.J. Powles, et al.. (2000). Apoptosis and proliferation as predictors of chemotherapy response in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 89(11). 2145–2152. 143 indexed citations

2.

Chang, Jenny C., T.J. Powles, D. Craig Allred, et al.. (2000). Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients.. PubMed. 6(2). 616–21. 90 indexed citations

3.

Smith, IE, et al.. (1995). Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 71(2). 366–370. 144 indexed citations

4.

Powles, T.J., et al.. (1993). A toxic interaction between mitomycin C and tamoxifen causing the haemolytic uraemic syndrome. European Journal of Cancer. 29(13). 1854–1857. 38 indexed citations

5.

Hardy, Janet, TJ Powles, Ian Judson, et al.. (1990). How many tests are required in the diagnosis of palpable breast abnormalities?. Clinical Oncology. 2(3). 148–152. 14 indexed citations

6.

Glaholm, J., Lazzaro Repetto, John Yarnold, et al.. (1988). Carboplatin (JM8), etoposide (VP16) and thoracic Irradiation for small cell lung cancer (S.C.L.C.): An evaluation of lung toxicity. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 12(1). 31–37. 8 indexed citations

7.

Temperley, H. N. V. & S.E. Ashley. (1982). Site percolation problems and multisite Potts models. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 15(1). 215–222. 2 indexed citations

8.

Ashley, S.E.. (1978). A renormalisation group investigation of the Ashkin-Teller-Potts model. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 11(10). 2015–2032. 9 indexed citations

9.

Ashley, S.E., et al.. (1976). A variational renormalization group approach to two coupled Ising systems. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 9(11). L165–L170. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact