Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Job Creation and Destruction
1997524 citationsSteven J. Davis, John Haltiwanger et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Schuh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Schuh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Schuh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Schuh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Schuh. The network helps show where Scott Schuh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Schuh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Schuh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Schuh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Schuh. Scott Schuh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schuh, Scott, et al.. (2017). U. S. Consumer Cash Use, 2012 and 2015: An Introduction to the Diary of Consumer Payment Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
3.
Rysman, Marc & Scott Schuh. (2017). New Innovations in Payments. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 17. 27–48.25 indexed citations
Schuh, Scott, et al.. (2016). The 2014 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Summary Results. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Fulford, Scott & Scott Schuh. (2015). Consumer revolving credit and debt over the life cycle and business cycle. Econstor (Econstor).12 indexed citations
8.
Rysman, Marc, et al.. (2014). Costs and benefits of building faster payment systems: the U.K. experience and implications for the United States. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Schuh, Scott & Robert K. Triest. (2002). The Evolution of Regional Manufacturing Employment: Gross Job Flows within and between Firms and Industries. New England economic review. 35–53.5 indexed citations
14.
Schuh, Scott, et al.. (2002). Inventory Investment and Output Volatility. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
15.
Klein, Michael W., Scott Schuh, & Robert K. Triest. (2002). Job Creation, Job Destruction, and International Competition: A Literature Review. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
16.
Schuh, Scott. (2001). An Evaluation of Recent Macroeconomic Forecast Errors. New England economic review. 35–56.38 indexed citations
17.
Schuh, Scott & Robert K. Triest. (2000). The Role of Firms in Job Creation and Destruction in U.S. Manufacturing. New England economic review. 29–44.10 indexed citations
18.
Haltiwanger, John & Scott Schuh. (1999). Gross Job Flows between Plants and Industries. New England economic review. 41–64.25 indexed citations
19.
Schuh, Scott & Robert K. Triest. (1998). Job Reallocation And The Business Cycle: New Facts An Old Debate. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 42. 271–357.15 indexed citations
20.
Hildreth, Andrew, Steven J. Davis, John Haltiwanger, & Scott Schuh. (1997). Job Creation and Destruction.. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 51(1). 143–143.110 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.