Scott Rutherford
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Michael MannJosefino C. ComisoEric J. SteigDavid P. SchneiderDrew ShindellEmily WalshJohn B. KirkpatrickMitchell L. Sogin
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (5 papers)Tree-ring climate responses (3 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Scott Rutherford
12 papers receiving 781 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Atmospheric Science 469
- Ecology 379
- Global and Planetary Change 261
- Oceanography 154
- Molecular Biology 99
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Rutherford
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Rutherford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Rutherford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Rutherford. The network helps show where Scott Rutherford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Rutherford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Rutherford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Rutherford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Rutherford. Scott Rutherford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 171 | |
| 5 | DISCUSSION OF: A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE TEMPERATURE PROXIES: ARE RECONSTRUCTIONS OF SURFACE TEMPERATURES OVER THE LAST 1000 YEARS RELIABLE? | 4 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Project Snowball – Sharing Data for Cross-institutional Benchmarking | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | Warming of the Antarctic ice-sheet surface since the 1957 International Geophysical Yearbreakdown → | 539 |
| 11 | Implementation of Systems to Support the Management of Research: Commentary from a UK University Perspective | 4 |
| 12 | 40 |
About Scott Rutherford
Scott Rutherford is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Management Information Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (5 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (3 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (469 citations), Ecology (379 citations) and Oceanography (154 citations). Scott Rutherford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael Mann, Josefino C. Comiso, Eric J. Steig, David P. Schneider, Drew Shindell, Emily Walsh, John B. Kirkpatrick, Mitchell L. Sogin, David C. Smith and Steven D’Hondt. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Climate and Limnology and Oceanography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.