Scott Monteith

29 papers receiving 912 citations

Peers

Scott Monteith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Informatics 92
  • Applied Psychology 317
  • Family Practice 37
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 172
Replace Jiska J Aardoom with:
Jiska J Aardoom Netherlands
Rachel Kornfield United States
John Pestian United States
Michael Liebrenz Switzerland
Lamiece Hassan United Kingdom
Sumithra Velupillai Sweden
Mark Larsen Australia
Michael H. Bernstein United States
Giang Hai Ha Vietnam
Miguel Ángel Mayer Spain
Scott Monteith relative to Jiska J Aardoom Netherlands Jiska J Aardoom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Jiska J Aardoom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Monteith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Monteith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Monteith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Monteith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Monteith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Monteith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Monteith. The network helps show where Scott Monteith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Scott Monteith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Monteith Line = papers co-authored together Scott Monteith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201493
2 202090
3 201789
4 202383
5 201480
6 202157
7 201552
8 201640
9 201936
10 201636
11 201733
12 202227
13 202226
14 201722
15 201922
16 201919
17 201519
18 201315
19 202014
20 202113

About Scott Monteith

Scott Monteith is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Family Practice, Applied Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (6 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (92 citations), Applied Psychology (317 citations), Family Practice (37 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (52 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (172 citations). Scott Monteith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tasha Glenn, Michael Bauer, John Geddes, Peter C. Whybrow, Eric D. Achtyes, Rita Bauer, Michael Gitlin, Paul Grof, Martin Alda and Emanuel Severus. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, Current Psychiatry Reports, Pharmacopsychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026