Scott M. McClintic
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Steven T. BaileyYali JiaDavid HuangChristina J. FlaxelThomas S. HwangSimon S. GaoAndreas LauerMark E. Pennesi
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAmerican Journal of OphthalmologyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Scott M. McClintic
14 papers receiving 695 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Ophthalmology 602
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 493
- Biomedical Engineering 206
- Molecular Biology 71
- Surgery 32
Countries citing papers authored by Scott M. McClintic
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott M. McClintic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott M. McClintic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott M. McClintic more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott M. McClintic
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott M. McClintic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott M. McClintic. The network helps show where Scott M. McClintic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott M. McClintic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott M. McClintic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott M. McClintic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott M. McClintic. Scott M. McClintic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | The gut microbiome in advanced age-related macular degeneration | 6 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eyebreakdown → | 558 |
| 9 | Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of the choriocapillaris in central serous chorioretinopathy | 1 |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 14 |
About Scott M. McClintic
Scott M. McClintic is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (602 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (493 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (206 citations). Scott M. McClintic has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven T. Bailey, Yali Jia, David Huang, Christina J. Flaxel, Thomas S. Hwang, Simon S. Gao, Andreas Lauer, Mark E. Pennesi, David J. Wilson and Joachim Hornegger. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.