Scott M. Eisenkop
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.1%
- Surgery top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nick M. SpirtosRichard L. FriedmanJohn B. SchlaerthHong WangRobert S. MannelJoan L. WalkerMichael L. PearlSudarshan Sharma
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (25 papers)Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (20 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Scott M. Eisenkop
41 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Reproductive Medicine 2.8k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.4k
- Surgery 2.1k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 467
- Oncology 380
Countries citing papers authored by Scott M. Eisenkop
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott M. Eisenkop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott M. Eisenkop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott M. Eisenkop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott M. Eisenkop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott M. Eisenkop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott M. Eisenkop. The network helps show where Scott M. Eisenkop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott M. Eisenkop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott M. Eisenkop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott M. Eisenkop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott M. Eisenkop. Scott M. Eisenkop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recurrence and Survival After Random Assignment to Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Studybreakdown → | 522 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2breakdown → | 904 |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 312 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 168 | |
| 10 | 112 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 149 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 91 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 222 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Scott M. Eisenkop
Scott M. Eisenkop is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, having authored 41 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (25 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (20 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (2.8k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.4k citations) and Surgery (2.1k citations). Scott M. Eisenkop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nick M. Spirtos, Richard L. Friedman, John B. Schlaerth, Hong Wang, Robert S. Mannel, Joan L. Walker, Michael L. Pearl, Sudarshan Sharma, Richard R. Barakat and Wei-Chien Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.