Scott K. Gleeson

29 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Scott K. Gleeson
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 561
  • Soil Science 294
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 353
  • Ecology 350
  • Global and Planetary Change 267
Replace Robert H. Jones with:
Robert H. Jones United States
Jean Knops United States
Fernanda Vendramini Argentina
J. Modrzyński Poland
Cynthia M. Hale United States
Tara K. Rajaniemi United States
Mark R. Stromberg United States
Jörn Alphei Germany
Liam Heneghan United States
Laura A. Hyatt United States
Scott K. Gleeson relative to Robert H. Jones United States Robert H. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert H. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott K. Gleeson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott K. Gleeson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott K. Gleeson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott K. Gleeson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott K. Gleeson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott K. Gleeson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott K. Gleeson. The network helps show where Scott K. Gleeson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Scott K. Gleeson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott K. Gleeson Line = papers co-authored together Scott K. Gleeson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990192
2 1990191
3 1992163
4 199492
5 198267
6 198655
7 199349
8 198146
9 199443
10 199335
11 200335
12 199729
13 200328
14 199526
15 198225
16
Population structure of Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) and its invasion impacts on the resident plant community in the grasslands of Nilgiris, India.
200717
17 200414
18 201113
19 19949
20 19968

About Scott K. Gleeson

Scott K. Gleeson is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Soil Science, Plant Science and Ecology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (561 citations), Soil Science (294 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (353 citations), Ecology (350 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (267 citations). Scott K. Gleeson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Tilman, Donald R. Zak, Ralph E. Good, David Sloan Wilson, Andrew Sih, Glenn R. Matlack, Mary A. Arthur, Sandra Johnson, Beth A. Blankenship and Andrew M. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Ecology, Oikos, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society and The Quarterly Review of Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact