Scott J. Shapiro
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Law top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Oona A. HathawayDavid PlunkettJoshua KnobeCass R. SunsteinRužica PiskačBettina Könighofer
- Topics
- Free Will and Agency (6 papers)Law in Society and Culture (4 papers)International Law and Human Rights (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Scott J. Shapiro
19 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Political Science and International Relations 128
- Law 114
- Sociology and Political Science 61
- Philosophy 53
- Cognitive Neuroscience 42
Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott J. Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Shapiro. The network helps show where Scott J. Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott J. Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott J. Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott J. Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott J. Shapiro. Scott J. Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | The internationalists : and their plan to outlaw war | 17 |
| 8 | Law, Morality and Everything Else: General Jurisprudence as a Branch of Meta-Normative Inquiry | 3 |
| 9 | What Realists Don't Understand About the Law | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World | 50 |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law | 20 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Scott J. Shapiro
Scott J. Shapiro is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (114 citations), Political Science and International Relations (128 citations) and Philosophy (53 citations). Scott J. Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Oona A. Hathaway, David Plunkett, Joshua Knobe, Cass R. Sunstein, Ružica Piskač and Bettina Könighofer. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, Ethics and The Yale Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.