Scott J. Fatt
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jasmine FardoulyRonald M. RapeePhillipa HayDeborah MitchisonUté Vollmer‐ConnaJessica E. BeilharzAndrew R. LloydErin Cvejic
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (12 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers)Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Eating DisordersNew Media & SocietyAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Scott J. Fatt
15 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 211
- Sociology and Political Science 63
- Psychiatry and Mental health 45
- Literature and Literary Theory 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Fatt
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Fatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Fatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Fatt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott J. Fatt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Fatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Fatt. The network helps show where Scott J. Fatt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott J. Fatt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott J. Fatt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott J. Fatt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott J. Fatt. Scott J. Fatt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 82 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 16 |
About Scott J. Fatt
Scott J. Fatt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (12 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (211 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations) and Applied Psychology (23 citations). Scott J. Fatt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jasmine Fardouly, Ronald M. Rapee, Phillipa Hay, Deborah Mitchison, Uté Vollmer‐Conna, Jessica E. Beilharz, Andrew R. Lloyd, Erin Cvejic, Chloe Wilson and Sinead Day. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, New Media & Society and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.