Scott D. Steenburg

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Scott D. Steenburg
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Health Informatics 37
  • Emergency Medicine 196
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 282
  • Surgery 496
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
Replace Fábio Pinto with:
Fábio Pinto Italy
Christopher G. Anton United States
Gerald de Lacey United Kingdom
Brent Burbridge Canada
Niels W. L. Schep Netherlands
Jamlik-Omari Johnson United States
James Michael Milburn United States
Mary K. Oerline United States
Harry W. Severance United States
Hany Bahouth Israel
Scott D. Steenburg relative to Fábio Pinto Italy Fábio Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Fábio Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Steenburg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Steenburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Steenburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Steenburg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Steenburg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Steenburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Steenburg. The network helps show where Scott D. Steenburg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Steenburg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott D. Steenburg Line = papers co-authored together Scott D. Steenburg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014118
2 2008105
3 2013101
4 201070
5 202066
6 201960
7 201552
8 200843
9 200631
10 202128
11 202227
12 201125
13 202122
14 202222
15 200721
16 201420
17 201520
18 201520
19 201820
20 201017

About Scott D. Steenburg

Scott D. Steenburg is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma Management and Diagnosis (11 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (11 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (9 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (8 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (7 papers), Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (4 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (37 citations), Emergency Medicine (196 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (282 citations), Surgery (496 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations). Scott D. Steenburg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James G. Ravenel, Clint W. Sliker, Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan, Changyu Shen, John S. Ikonomidis, Eliot L. Siegel, Tarek Noel Hanna, Scott T. Reeves, Eric B. Friedberg and Robert S. Pyatt. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Radiology, Journal of the American College of Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiology and Radiographics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact