Scott Cederburg
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 19
- Accounting top 10%
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis 6
- Corporate Finance and Governance 6
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Housing Market and Economics 8
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 7
- Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis 4
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 9
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 3
- Co-authors
- Michael S. O’DohertyFeifei WangDoron AvramovXuemin Sterling YanDavid BrownKatarína LučivjanskáTravis L. JohnsonKainan Wang
- Journals
- The Journal of Finance (1 paper)Journal of Financial Economics (3 papers)Review of Financial Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Scott Cederburg
20 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Finance 251
- Accounting 98
- Economics and Econometrics 188
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 47
- Management Science and Operations Research 38
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Cederburg
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Cederburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Cederburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Cederburg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Cederburg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Cederburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Cederburg. The network helps show where Scott Cederburg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Scott Cederburg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 72 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 80 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0 |
About Scott Cederburg
Scott Cederburg is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Accounting, having authored 26 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (19 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (9 papers), Housing Market and Economics (8 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (4 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (251 citations), Accounting (98 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (188 citations). Scott Cederburg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. O’Doherty, Feifei Wang, Doron Avramov, Xuemin Sterling Yan, David Brown, Katarína Lučivjanská, Travis L. Johnson, Kainan Wang, Richard W. Sias and Ashish Tiwari. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Review of Financial Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.