Scott C. Levi
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
-
- Islamic Studies and History
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Soviet and Russian History
Papers in
- Anthropology 11
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 7
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 4
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 1
-
- Islamic Studies and History 4
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 3
- Soviet and Russian History 2
- Co-authors
- Muzaffar Alam (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient (2 papers)Iranian Studies (1 paper)Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East (1 paper)Journal of Global History (1 paper)History Compass (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Scott C. Levi
11 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Anthropology 103
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- Classics 15
- Sociology and Political Science 70
- Archeology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Scott C. Levi
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott C. Levi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott C. Levi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott C. Levi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott C. Levi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott C. Levi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott C. Levi. The network helps show where Scott C. Levi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Scott C. Levi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 5 | India and Central Asia : commerce and culture, 1500-1800 | 2007 | 14 |
| 6 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 8 | The Rise and Fall of Khoqand, 1709-1876: Central Asia in the Global Age | 2017 | 3 |
| 9 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | The Bukharan Crisis: A Connected History of 18th Century Central Asia | 2020 | 1 |
About Scott C. Levi
Scott C. Levi is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Archeology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eurasian Exchange Networks (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (4 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers), Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (3 papers), Soviet and Russian History (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (103 citations), Political Science and International Relations (121 citations), Classics (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (70 citations) and Archeology (16 citations). Scott C. Levi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Muzaffar Alam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Iranian Studies, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Journal of Global History and History Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.