Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Rural Community and Rural Resilience: What is important to farmers in keeping their country towns alive?
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Baum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Baum. The network helps show where Scott Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Baum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Baum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Baum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Baum. Scott Baum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stimson, Robert J., Michael Flanagan, William Mitchell, Tung-Kai Shyy, & Scott Baum. (2018). Modelling endogenous employment performance across Australia's functional economic regions over the decade 2001 to 2011. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 24(1). 3–34.5 indexed citations
3.
Baum, Scott, Michael Flanagan, William Mitchell, & Robert J. Stimson. (2018). Wage inequality across Australian labour market regions. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 24(2). 124–146.
4.
Stimson, Robert J., William Mitchell, Michael Flanagan, Scott Baum, & Tung-Kai Shyy. (2016). Demarcating Functional Economic Regions across Australia Differentiated by Work Participation Categories. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 22(1). 27–57.6 indexed citations
5.
Baum, Scott, Kevin O’Connor, & William Mitchell. (2010). Population and Employment Change in Australia's Functional Economic Regions. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 16(2). 183–202.6 indexed citations
6.
Baum, Scott, William Mitchell, & Hoon Han. (2009). Socio-economic performance across Australia's non-Metropolitan Functional Economic Regions. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).4 indexed citations
7.
Yiğitcanlar, Tan, Koray Velibeyoğlu, & Scott Baum. (2008). Creative Urban Regions. IGI Global eBooks.60 indexed citations
8.
Baum, Scott, et al.. (2008). Local Urban Communities and Extreme Weather Events: Mapping Social Vulnerability to Flood. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 14(3). 251–273.15 indexed citations
9.
Baum, Scott, et al.. (2008). Employment Outcomes in Non Metropolitan Labour Markets: Individual and Regional Labour Market Factors. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 14(1). 5–25.2 indexed citations
10.
Baum, Scott & William Mitchell. (2008). Adequate Employment, Underutilisation and Unemployment: An Analysis of Labour Force Outcomes for Australian Youth.. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 11(3). 187–201.18 indexed citations
11.
Wulff, Maryann, et al.. (2007). Trends in Australian non-metropolitan housing markets, 1991-2001. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).1 indexed citations
12.
Baum, Scott, et al.. (2007). Research Monograph: The role of community and lifestyle in the making of a knowledge city. Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering.6 indexed citations
13.
Baum, Scott & Robert J. Stimson. (2005). Analysis of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage in Australia’s large non-metropolitan regions. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 11(3). 231–243.1 indexed citations
14.
Baum, Scott. (2004). THE SOCIO-SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF AUSTRALIA'S METROPOLITAN REGIONS. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 10(2). 157–178.6 indexed citations
15.
Baum, Scott. (2004). Measuring socio-economic outcomes in Sydney: An analysis of census data using a general deprivation index. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 10(1). 105.16 indexed citations
16.
Baum, Scott & Maryann Wulff. (2003). Housing aspirations of Australian households.17 indexed citations
17.
Scrase, Timothy J., et al.. (2002). Globalization, culture and inequality in Asia.5 indexed citations
18.
Baum, Scott & Maryann Wulff. (2002). Housing aspirations of young Australians: variations on a dream.. 10.4 indexed citations
19.
Stimson, Robert J. & Scott Baum. (2001). Patterns of disadvantage and advantage across Australia's Communities: A focus on education and human capital. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 105. 9–33.4 indexed citations
20.
Baum, Scott, Mary C. Sheehan, Megan Ferguson, & Cynthia C. Schonfeld. (1998). Drink Driving as a Social Problem: Comparing the Attitudes and Knowledge of Drink Driving Offenders and the General Community. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.