Scott A. Enebak

1.2k total citations
55 papers, 866 citations indexed

About

Scott A. Enebak is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott A. Enebak has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 866 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 14 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Scott A. Enebak's work include Seedling growth and survival studies (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (14 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers). Scott A. Enebak is often cited by papers focused on Seedling growth and survival studies (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (14 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers). Scott A. Enebak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Scott A. Enebak's co-authors include William A. Carey, C. P. Chanway, Elizabeth Bent, Joseph W. Kloepper, S. Tuzun, Gang Wei, David B. South, G. R. Stanosz, Robert A. Blanchette and Thomas Wesley Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Plant and Soil, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology and Phytopathology.

In The Last Decade

Scott A. Enebak

54 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers

Scott A. Enebak

NLC

ECOLO

ENDOC

Jorge Martín‐García Spain

Carolyn H. Keiffer United States

Peter H. Dernoeden United States

Tālis Gaitnieks Latvia

Risto Kasanen Finland

Lucio Montecchio Italy

Jennifer Juzwik United States

Piotr Łakomy Poland

Rafael Sánchez‐Cuesta Spain

Shasheng Wang China

Jorge Martín‐García Spain

Scott A. Enebak

479 ×0.7

344 ×1.8

131 ×0.8

NLC

196 ×1.4

ECOLO

67 ×0.6

ENDOC

Citations per year, relative to Scott A. Enebak Scott A. Enebak (= 1×) peers Jorge Martín‐García

Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Enebak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Enebak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Enebak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Enebak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Enebak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Enebak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Enebak. The network helps show where Scott A. Enebak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott A. Enebak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott A. Enebak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott A. Enebak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott A. Enebak. Scott A. Enebak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Stokes, Thomas A., et al.. (2023). In-Field Pine Seedling Counting Using End-to-End Deep Learning for Inventory Management. Journal of the ASABE. 66(2). 469–477. 3 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of methyl bromide alternatives on loblolly pine production and seedling quality over three growing seasons at the Pine Hill Nursery in Camden, Alabama. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 5(3). 41–47. 2 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2013). Control of Rhizoctonia foliar blight in forest seedling nurseries: A 3-year study. 69. 11–16. 1 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2012). Effect of methyl bromide alternatives on seedling quality, nematodes and soilborne fungi at the Blenheim and Trenton nurseries in South Carolina: 2008 to 2009. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 4(1). 1–7. 4 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2011). Effect of methyl bromide alternatives on seedling quality, nematodes and pathogenic soil fungi at the Jesup and Glennville Nurseries in Georgia: 2007 to 2008. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 3(5). 150–158. 6 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A.. (2011). Historical forest seedling production in the southern United States: 2008 to 2009 planting season. 65. 19–34. 1 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2007). Evaluation of Fumigants, EPTC Herbicide, and Paenibacillus macerans in the Production of Loblolly Pine Seedlings. Forest Science. 53(1). 73–83. 2 indexed citations

Carey, William A., Steven W. Oak, & Scott A. Enebak. (2005). Pitch canker ratings of longleaf pine clones correlate with Fusarium circinatum infestation of seeds and seedling mortality in containers. Forest Pathology. 35(3). 205–212. 11 indexed citations

Enebak, Scott A. & William A. Carey. (2003). Pitch Canker Caused by Fusarium circinatum Identified on Spruce Pine in Alabama. Plant Disease. 87(4). 449–449. 4 indexed citations

10.

Enebak, Scott A. & G. R. Stanosz. (2003). Responses of conifer species of the Great Lakes region of North America to inoculation with the pitch canker pathogen Fusarium circinatum. Forest Pathology. 33(5). 333–338. 26 indexed citations

11.

Bent, Elizabeth, Colette Breuil, Scott A. Enebak, & C. P. Chanway. (2002). Surface colonization of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia [Dougl. Engelm.]) roots by Pseudomonas fluorescens and Paenibacillus polymyxa under gnotobiotic conditions. Plant and Soil. 241(2). 187–196. 23 indexed citations

12.

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2002). Chloropicrin, EPTC, and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for managing soilborne pests in pine nurseries. 24. 1 indexed citations

13.

Bent, Elizabeth, S. Tuzun, C. P. Chanway, & Scott A. Enebak. (2001). Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 47(9). 793–800. 111 indexed citations

14.

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (2001). Influence of Two Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Loblolly Pine Root Respiration and IAA Activity. Forest Science. 47(2). 197–202. 11 indexed citations

15.

Blanchette, Robert A., et al.. (2000). Biomechanical pulping with Phlebiopsis gigantea reduced energy consumption and increased paper strength. 83(9). 7 indexed citations

16.

Enebak, Scott A., Gang Wei, & Joseph W. Kloepper. (1998). Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Loblolly and Slash Pine Seedlings. Forest Science. 44(1). 139–144. 96 indexed citations

17.

Blanchette, Robert A., et al.. (1998). New approach to effective biopulping: Treating logs with Phlebiopsis gigantea. 1 indexed citations

18.

Enebak, Scott A.. (1994). Effect of dsRNA Associated with Isolates ofCryphonectria parasiticafrom the Central Appalachians and Their Relatedness to Other dsRNAs from North America and Europe. Phytopathology. 84(5). 528–528. 74 indexed citations

19.

Enebak, Scott A.. (1994). A Hypovirulent Isolate ofCryphonectria parasiticawith Multiple, Genetically Unique dsRNA Segments. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 7(5). 590–590. 33 indexed citations

20.

Enebak, Scott A., et al.. (1990). Comparison of disease management strategies for control of soil-borne pathogens in a forest tree nursery.. 41(1). 29–33. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact