Scellig Stone

2.9k citations
75 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Scellig Stone

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Scellig Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Developmental Neuroscience 275
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 724
  • Neurology 527
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 632
  • Neurology 247
Replace Daniel E. Huddleston with:
Daniel E. Huddleston United States
Anita Kamondi Hungary
Margherita Di Paola Italy
Maria Cecilia Gioia Italy
K. Jürgen Germany
Nikolai Malykhin Canada
Marc Rey France
Robert A. McGovern United States
Jonas A. Hosp Germany
Peter Seres Canada
Scellig Stone relative to Daniel E. Huddleston United States Daniel E. Huddleston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniel E. Huddleston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scellig Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scellig Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scellig Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scellig Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scellig Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scellig Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scellig Stone. The network helps show where Scellig Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scellig Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scellig Stone Line = papers co-authored together Scellig Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010372
2 2011298
3 2010140
4 2014106
5 201185
6 201071
7 201750
8 200746
9 200746
10 201334
11 202332
12 202332
13 201530
14 202326
15 201125
16 202320
17 200816
18 201716
19 201716
20 201414

About Scellig Stone

Scellig Stone is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (25 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (16 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (8 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (8 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (275 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (724 citations), Neurology (527 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (632 citations) and Neurology (247 citations). Scellig Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andrés M. Lozano, Clement Hamani, Adrian W. Laxton, Paul W. Frankland, Benjamin C. Warf, Helen S. Mayberg, Suzanne N. Haber, Cátia M. Teixeira, Kirill Zaslavsky and Sheena A. Josselyn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, Neurosurgery, Epilepsia, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology and Brain Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact