Scarlett Gillespie

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

Scarlett Gillespie is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Scarlett Gillespie has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 4 papers in Emergency Medicine and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Scarlett Gillespie's work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Scarlett Gillespie is often cited by papers focused on Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Scarlett Gillespie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Scarlett Gillespie's co-authors include Paul Vulliamy, Karim Brohi, Paul C. Armstrong, Timothy D. Warner, Lewis Gall, Ross Davenport, Harriet E. Allan, Felicity N. E. Gavins, Laura Green and Nicole P. Juffermans and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of Surgery and British Journal of Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Scarlett Gillespie

10 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Scarlett Gillespie
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 162
  • Emergency Medicine 131
  • Molecular Biology 67
  • Biochemistry 61
  • Surgery 60
Replace Shu Lu with:
Shu Lu United States
Constantino José Fernandes Brazil
Natalie M. Pecheniuk Australia
Sung Min Lee South Korea
B. Löffler Germany
Cécile Kicken Netherlands
Elisabeth Zechendorf Germany
Mélanie Burban France
Giacomo Stanzani United Kingdom
Yasuhisa Wakabayashi Japan
Shu Lu United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Scarlett Gillespie
Scarlett Gillespie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Scarlett Gillespie
Scarlett Gillespie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Scarlett Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scarlett Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scarlett Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scarlett Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scarlett Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scarlett Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scarlett Gillespie. The network helps show where Scarlett Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scarlett Gillespie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scarlett Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scarlett Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scarlett Gillespie. Scarlett Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 32
2 74
3 76
4 20
5 53
6 34
7 6
8 2
9 21
10 19

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026