Saswati Mukherjee
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Étienne MédardM. S. GhiorsoFred A. DavisStacia M. GordonT. L. GroveM. J. KrawczynskiC. B. TillM. M. Hirschmann
- Topics
- Cloud Computing and Resource Management (8 papers)IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (7 papers)Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Saswati Mukherjee
45 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Computer Networks and Communications 115
- Geophysics 79
- Information Systems 75
- Artificial Intelligence 70
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 23
Countries citing papers authored by Saswati Mukherjee
This map shows the geographic impact of Saswati Mukherjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saswati Mukherjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saswati Mukherjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Saswati Mukherjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saswati Mukherjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saswati Mukherjee. The network helps show where Saswati Mukherjee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saswati Mukherjee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saswati Mukherjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saswati Mukherjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Saswati Mukherjee. Saswati Mukherjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Category Based Feature Weighting for Automatic Text Categorization. | 1 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Saswati Mukherjee
Saswati Mukherjee is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 49 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cloud Computing and Resource Management (8 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (7 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (79 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (115 citations) and Information Systems (75 citations). Saswati Mukherjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Étienne Médard, M. S. Ghiorso, Fred A. Davis, Stacia M. Gordon, T. L. Grove, M. J. Krawczynski, C. B. Till, M. M. Hirschmann, K. Selvamani and R. Anitha. Their work appears in journals such as Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Ad Hoc Networks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.