Sarah Woods
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kerstin DautenhahnKheng Lee KoayMichael L. WaltersDieter WolkeC. KaouriIain WerryLynne HallRené te Boekhorst
- Topics
- Social Robot Interaction and HRI (19 papers)Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (10 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalGermany
In The Last Decade
Sarah Woods
37 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Social Psychology 1.9k
- Artificial Intelligence 813
- Control and Systems Engineering 398
- Clinical Psychology 370
- Education 306
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Woods
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Woods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Woods
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Woods. The network helps show where Sarah Woods may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Woods
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Woods. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Woods based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Woods. Sarah Woods is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Making Teacher Thinking Transparent: An Examination of Teacher Think-Aloud Instruction | 0 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 65 | |
| 6 | Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance. | 49 |
| 7 | Robot to Human Approaches: Preliminary Results on Comfortable Distances and Preferences. | 10 |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 79 | |
| 10 | 100 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | 364 | |
| 15 | Child and Adults Perspectives on Robot Appearance | 24 |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 236 | |
| 18 | FearNot! Designing in the classroom | 5 |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Bullying and victimisation of primary school children in south England and south Germany: Prevalence and school factors | 29 |
About Sarah Woods
Sarah Woods is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Clinical Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (19 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (10 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.9k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (279 citations) and Safety Research (243 citations). Sarah Woods has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kerstin Dautenhahn, Kheng Lee Koay, Michael L. Walters, Dieter Wolke, C. Kaouri, Iain Werry, Lynne Hall, René te Boekhorst, Ruth Aylett and Ana Paiva. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Child Abuse & Neglect and Journal of Adolescence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.