Sarah Winch

1.8k total citations
47 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sarah Winch is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Winch has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Winch's work include Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (11 papers). Sarah Winch is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (11 papers). Sarah Winch collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Singapore. Sarah Winch's co-authors include Amanda Henderson, Kerri Holzhauser, Jessica Schluter, Kim Lützén, Béatrice Marianne Ewalds‐Kvist, Malcolm Parker, Debra Creedy, Letitia Burridge, Cindy Gallois and Ben White and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Winch

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Winch Australia 18 879 632 143 136 133 47 1.3k
Tahereh Ashktorab Iran 18 693 0.8× 453 0.7× 246 1.7× 102 0.8× 77 0.6× 100 1.3k
Soodabeh Joolaee Iran 20 587 0.7× 477 0.8× 276 1.9× 58 0.4× 123 0.9× 95 1.2k
Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh Iran 20 857 1.0× 435 0.7× 275 1.9× 127 0.9× 155 1.2× 112 1.5k
Joan Liaschenko United States 22 865 1.0× 627 1.0× 223 1.6× 38 0.3× 146 1.1× 58 1.4k
Olivia Numminen Finland 21 1.1k 1.2× 534 0.8× 134 0.9× 238 1.8× 56 0.4× 31 1.5k
Marjorie A. Schaffer United States 22 766 0.9× 428 0.7× 146 1.0× 31 0.2× 100 0.8× 54 1.3k
Per Nortvedt Norway 27 938 1.1× 911 1.4× 328 2.3× 34 0.3× 267 2.0× 78 1.7k
Soroor Parvizy Iran 21 439 0.5× 232 0.4× 236 1.7× 36 0.3× 74 0.6× 100 1.1k
Hannu Isoaho Finland 20 795 0.9× 564 0.9× 255 1.8× 29 0.2× 96 0.7× 43 1.7k
Moira Attree United Kingdom 16 523 0.6× 245 0.4× 87 0.6× 28 0.2× 129 1.0× 27 969

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Winch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Winch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Winch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Winch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Winch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Winch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Winch. The network helps show where Sarah Winch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Winch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Winch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Winch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Winch. Sarah Winch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Carter, Hannah, Xing J. Lee, Cindy Gallois, et al.. (2019). Factors associated with non-beneficial treatments in end of life hospital admissions: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open. 9(11). e030955–e030955. 14 indexed citations
3.
O’Hara, Blythe J., Najma Ahmed, Sarah Winch, et al.. (2017). Enhancing the get healthy information and coaching service for Aboriginal adults: evaluation of the process and impact of the program. International Journal for Equity in Health. 16(1). 168–168. 18 indexed citations
4.
Willmott, Lindy, Ben White, Cindy Gallois, et al.. (2016). Reasons Doctors Provide Futile Treatment at the End of Life: A Qualitative Study. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
5.
Willmott, Lindy, Ben White, Cindy Gallois, et al.. (2016). Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Ethics. 42(8). 496–503. 78 indexed citations
6.
Milligan, Eleanor, et al.. (2012). Marketing to register organ donors may circumvent principles of informed consent. BMJ. 345(aug31 1). e5850–e5850. 2 indexed citations
7.
Winch, Sarah, et al.. (2011). Emergency medicine and futile care: Taking the road less travelled. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 23(5). 640–643. 28 indexed citations
8.
Henderson, Amanda, Sarah Winch, & Kerri Holzhauser. (2009). Leadership: the critical success factor in the rise or fall of useful research activity. Journal of Nursing Management. 17(8). 942–946. 14 indexed citations
9.
Winch, Sarah, et al.. (2008). Nurses' moral sensitivity and hospital ethical climate. Nursing Ethics. 15(3). 5 indexed citations
10.
Holzhauser, Kerri, Marie Cooke, Sarah Winch, Julie Finucane, & Cathy Davis. (2008). Developing a Research-Active Clinical Environment Within the Emergency Department: A Case Study. Journal of Professional Nursing. 24(1). 36–41. 1 indexed citations
11.
Henderson, Amanda & Sarah Winch. (2008). Managing the clinical setting for best nursing practice: a brief overview of contemporary initiatives. Journal of Nursing Management. 16(1). 92–95. 6 indexed citations
12.
Henderson, Amanda, Mary Boyde, & Sarah Winch. (2007). The impact of progress toward a Clinical Development Unit in Cardiology. Contemporary Nurse. 24(1). 25–32. 2 indexed citations
13.
Eaton, Emma, Amanda Henderson, & Sarah Winch. (2007). Enhancing nurses' capacity to facilitate learning in nursing students: Effective dissemination and uptake of best practice guidelines. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 13(5). 316–320. 21 indexed citations
14.
Henderson, Amanda, et al.. (2006). The motivation of health professionals to explore research evidence in their practice: an intervention study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 15(12). 1559–1564. 26 indexed citations
15.
Pisarski, Anne, et al.. (2006). Extending a Model of Shift‐Work Tolerance. Chronobiology International. 23(6). 1363–1377. 48 indexed citations
16.
Winch, Sarah, Amanda Henderson, & Debra Creedy. (2005). Read, Think, Do!: a method for fitting research evidence into practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 50(1). 20–26. 32 indexed citations
17.
Boyde, Mary, et al.. (2005). A clinical development unit in cardiology: The way forward. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 11(3). 134–139. 8 indexed citations
18.
Henderson, Amanda, et al.. (2005). Partner, learn, progress: A conceptual model for continuous clinical education. Nurse Education Today. 26(2). 104–109. 41 indexed citations
19.
Henderson, Amanda, et al.. (2005). 'Working from the inside': an infrastructure for the continuing development of nurses' professional clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Management. 13(2). 106–110. 23 indexed citations
20.
Winch, Sarah, Debra Creedy, & Wendy Chaboyer. (2002). Governing nursing conduct: the rise of evidence‐based practice. Nursing Inquiry. 9(3). 156–161. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tahereh Ashktorab Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Soodabeh Joolaee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joan Liaschenko Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olivia Numminen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marjorie A. Schaffer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Per Nortvedt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Soroor Parvizy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hannu Isoaho Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Moira Attree
Rankless by CCL
2026