Sarah S. Connell

510 total citations
11 papers, 407 citations indexed

About

Sarah S. Connell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah S. Connell has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 407 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Sensory Systems and 2 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Sarah S. Connell's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). Sarah S. Connell is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). Sarah S. Connell collaborates with scholars based in United States and Uruguay. Sarah S. Connell's co-authors include Thomas J. Bałkany, Fred F. Telischi, Annelle V. Hodges, Simón I. Angeli, Adrien A. Eshraghi, Kevin D. Brown, Sarah Messiah, Kristopher L. Arheart, Karen Borne Teufert and Fred H. Linthicum and has published in prestigious journals such as The Laryngoscope, Otolaryngology and Otology & Neurotology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah S. Connell

10 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah S. Connell United States 8 335 270 132 94 31 11 407
Maja Svrakic United States 8 258 0.8× 198 0.7× 69 0.5× 117 1.2× 57 1.8× 18 363
Demin Han China 11 183 0.5× 131 0.5× 64 0.5× 59 0.6× 36 1.2× 22 322
Farid Alzhrani Saudi Arabia 12 270 0.8× 211 0.8× 162 1.2× 59 0.6× 21 0.7× 51 344
Richard Bussières Canada 7 241 0.7× 192 0.7× 112 0.8× 73 0.8× 14 0.5× 13 328
Rahel Gerig Switzerland 12 202 0.6× 164 0.6× 184 1.4× 56 0.6× 34 1.1× 12 369
Gamze Atay Türkiye 11 157 0.5× 149 0.6× 136 1.0× 61 0.6× 19 0.6× 28 350
Halit Sanli Australia 12 406 1.2× 400 1.5× 118 0.9× 86 0.9× 14 0.5× 29 516
Stephen P. Bowditch United States 9 360 1.1× 318 1.2× 154 1.2× 175 1.9× 25 0.8× 17 507
George L. Saly United States 11 280 0.8× 211 0.8× 201 1.5× 127 1.4× 62 2.0× 15 465
Nicolas Schmuziger Switzerland 11 326 1.0× 338 1.3× 146 1.1× 155 1.6× 20 0.6× 25 510

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah S. Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah S. Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah S. Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah S. Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah S. Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah S. Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah S. Connell. The network helps show where Sarah S. Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah S. Connell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah S. Connell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah S. Connell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah S. Connell. Sarah S. Connell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Connell, Sarah S., et al.. (2024). Seven-Year Revision Rates for Cochlear Implants in Pediatric and Adult Populations of an Integrated Healthcare System. Otology & Neurotology. 45(5). 529–535.
2.
Brown, Kevin D., et al.. (2008). Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. The Laryngoscope. 119(1). 152–157. 119 indexed citations
3.
Patterson, Danielle, Fred F. Telischi, Sarah S. Connell, et al.. (2008). Cochlear Implantation in Organ Transplantation. The Laryngoscope. 118(1). 116–119. 9 indexed citations
4.
Connell, Sarah S., Thomas J. Bałkany, Annelle V. Hodges, et al.. (2008). Electrode Migration After Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 29(2). 156–159. 44 indexed citations
5.
Connell, Sarah S., Simón I. Angeli, Hamlet Suárez, et al.. (2007). Performance after cochlear implantation in DFNB1 patients. Otolaryngology. 137(4). 596–602. 28 indexed citations
6.
Connell, Sarah S. & Thomas J. Bałkany. (2006). Cochlear Implants. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 22(3). 677–686. 11 indexed citations
7.
Connell, Sarah S., Simón I. Angeli, & Thomas R. Van De Water. (2006). R024: Safety and Durability of Sepragel vs Gelfoam Ear Packing. Otolaryngology. 135(S2). 2 indexed citations
8.
Bałkany, Thomas J., Sarah S. Connell, Annelle V. Hodges, et al.. (2006). Conservation of Residual Acoustic Hearing After Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 27(8). 1083–1088. 141 indexed citations
9.
Teufert, Karen Borne, Fred H. Linthicum, & Sarah S. Connell. (2006). The Effect of Organ of Corti Loss on Ganglion Cell Survival in Humans. Otology & Neurotology. 27(8). 1146–1151. 31 indexed citations
10.
Slattery, William H., Michael H. Lev, Laurel M. Fisher, et al.. (2005). MRI Evaluation of Neurofibromatosis 2 Patients: A Standardized Approach for Accuracy in Interpretation. Otology & Neurotology. 26(4). 733–740. 18 indexed citations
11.
Connell, Sarah S., et al.. (2004). Role of Cochlear Implantation in Susac's Syndrome. Otolaryngology. 131(2). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026