Halit Sanli

698 total citations
29 papers, 516 citations indexed

About

Halit Sanli is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Halit Sanli has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 516 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Halit Sanli's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (24 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers). Halit Sanli is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (24 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers). Halit Sanli collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and China. Halit Sanli's co-authors include W. P. R. Gibson, Joanna Walton, Kristina Prelog, Robert Patuzzi, Jaydip Ray, Catherine McMahon, Catherine S. Birman, Alison E. Parker, Colleen Psarros and Robert Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Ear and Hearing and Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

In The Last Decade

Halit Sanli

28 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Halit Sanli Australia 12 406 400 123 118 86 29 516
Hyun Joon Shim South Korea 15 422 1.0× 467 1.2× 284 2.3× 107 0.9× 182 2.1× 64 715
Giancarlo Cianfrone Italy 14 286 0.7× 508 1.3× 423 3.4× 113 1.0× 66 0.8× 40 676
Kevin P. Gibbin United Kingdom 14 455 1.1× 320 0.8× 92 0.7× 229 1.9× 62 0.7× 26 682
Francesca Cianfrone Italy 14 267 0.7× 345 0.9× 244 2.0× 152 1.3× 78 0.9× 30 575
George L. Saly United States 11 280 0.7× 211 0.5× 79 0.6× 201 1.7× 127 1.5× 15 465
Sandra Cleveland United States 7 428 1.1× 434 1.1× 136 1.1× 29 0.2× 257 3.0× 7 590
Arthur Menino Castilho Brazil 11 180 0.4× 218 0.5× 58 0.5× 99 0.8× 59 0.7× 51 354
Francesca Forli Italy 12 235 0.6× 195 0.5× 103 0.8× 115 1.0× 83 1.0× 21 378
Andrew Chang Australia 6 325 0.8× 362 0.9× 140 1.1× 117 1.0× 49 0.6× 8 414
Louise V. Straatman Netherlands 8 305 0.8× 278 0.7× 77 0.6× 51 0.4× 229 2.7× 19 496

Countries citing papers authored by Halit Sanli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Halit Sanli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Halit Sanli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Halit Sanli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Halit Sanli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Halit Sanli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Halit Sanli. The network helps show where Halit Sanli may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Halit Sanli

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Halit Sanli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Halit Sanli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Halit Sanli. Halit Sanli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hasan, Zubair, et al.. (2021). Risk Factors for Facial Nerve and Other Nonauditory Side Effects Following Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 42(8). e1022–e1029. 4 indexed citations
3.
Roberts, Sharon R., et al.. (2020). Simultaneous cochlear implantation and removal of acoustic neuroma: implications for hearing. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 134(6). 519–525. 6 indexed citations
4.
Hall, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome—Should We Provide Cochlear Implants Earlier?. Otology & Neurotology. 40(8). e769–e773. 11 indexed citations
5.
Birman, Catherine S., Halit Sanli, W. P. R. Gibson, & Elizabeth Elliott. (2014). Impedance, Neural Response Telemetry, and Speech Perception Outcomes After Reimplantation of Cochlear Implants in Children. Otology & Neurotology. 35(8). 1385–1393. 11 indexed citations
6.
Harris, Robert, et al.. (2011). Preliminary results and technique for electrophysiological intra-operative monitoring of residual hearing during cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International. 12(4). 209–215. 17 indexed citations
7.
Psarros, Colleen, et al.. (2009). Cortical potentials as predictors of outcomes with adult cochlear implant recipients — preliminary findings. Cochlear Implants International. 10(sup1). 89–95. 1 indexed citations
8.
Gibson, W. P. R., Halit Sanli, & Colleen Psarros. (2009). The use of intra-operative electrical auditory brainstem responses to predict the speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International. 10(sup1). 53–57. 17 indexed citations
9.
McMahon, Catherine, Robert Patuzzi, W. P. R. Gibson, & Halit Sanli. (2008). Frequency-Specific Electrocochleography Indicates that Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Mechanisms of Auditory Neuropathy Exist. Ear and Hearing. 29(3). 314–325. 64 indexed citations
10.
Walton, Joanna, et al.. (2008). Predicting Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Children With Auditory Neuropathy. Otology & Neurotology. 29(3). 302–309. 116 indexed citations
11.
Sanli, Halit, et al.. (2008). Meningitis resulting in hearing loss and labyrinthitis ossificans — does the causative organism matter?. Cochlear Implants International. 9(2). 90–96. 26 indexed citations
12.
Sanli, Halit, et al.. (2007). Auditory Neuropathy: An Update. Ear and Hearing. 28(2). 102S–106S. 81 indexed citations
13.
Gibson, W. P. R., et al.. (2006). Trans-tympanic electric auditory brainstem response (TT-EABR): the importance of the positioning of the stimulating electrode. Cochlear Implants International. 7(4). 183–187. 11 indexed citations
14.
Gibson, W. P. R., et al.. (2006). Cochlear implantations in children with Waardenburg syndrome: an electrophysiological and psychophysical review. Cochlear Implants International. 7(4). 202–206. 14 indexed citations
15.
Parker, Alison E., et al.. (2005). Displacement of electrodes of a cochlear implant into the vestibular system: Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological analyses. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 125(10). 1116–1118. 22 indexed citations
16.
Ray, Jaydip, W. P. R. Gibson, & Halit Sanli. (2004). Surgical complications of 844 consecutive cochlear implantations and observations on large versus small incisions. Cochlear Implants International. 5(3). 87–95. 37 indexed citations
17.
Ray, Jaydip, W. P. R. Gibson, & Halit Sanli. (2004). Role of auditory stimulation in maturation of the auditory pathway. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 124(6). 695–699. 5 indexed citations
18.
Gibson, W. P. R. & Halit Sanli. (2000). The Role of Round Window Electrophysiological Techniques in the Selection of Children for Cochlear Implants. Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. 57. 148–151. 13 indexed citations
19.
O’Sullivan, Brian, et al.. (1998). Assessment of auditory cortical function in cochlear implant patients. NeuroImage. 7(4). S384–S384. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gibson, W. P. R., et al.. (1997). Use of transtympanic round window electrocochleography for threshold estimations in children.. PubMed. 18(5). 632–6. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026