Sarah Piper

1.4k citations
22 papers · 734 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Piper

21 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Sarah Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 236
  • Structural Biology 20
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 47
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 189
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 125
Replace Laura Cervini with:
Laura Cervini United States
Jennifer R. Baker Australia
Hélène Orcel France
Hiroshi Karasawa Japan
R. Puech France
Lex Van der Ploeg United States
Aude Saulière France
R Ueno Japan
Laura J. Fick Canada
Natalia Petersen Denmark
Sarah Piper relative to Laura Cervini United States Laura Cervini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.2×
Laura Cervini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Piper. The network helps show where Sarah Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Piper Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200897
2 200478
3 200669
4 202163
5 200554
6 202147
7 202039
8 202237
9 202135
10 202230
11 200629
12 201927
13 202226
14 202125
15 201023
16 201720
17 202314
18 202210
19 20228
20
Live Fire and Simulator Marksmanship Performance with the M16A1 Rifle. Study 1. A Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Direct Fire Weapons Research Test Bed. Volume 1. Main Report
19872

About Sarah Piper

Sarah Piper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (6 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers) and Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (236 citations), Structural Biology (20 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (47 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (189 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (125 citations). Sarah Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony P. Coll, Stephen O’Rahilly, Denise Wootten, Giles S.H. Yeo, Patrick M. Sexton, Benjamin Challis, Radostin Danev, Matthew J. Belousoff, Marcella Ma and Rachel M. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Endocrinology, Journal of Neuroscience, Diabetes and Structure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact