Sarah Noblin

726 total citations
24 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

Sarah Noblin is a scholar working on Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Noblin has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Genetics, 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sarah Noblin's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (10 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers). Sarah Noblin is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (10 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers). Sarah Noblin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Sarah Noblin's co-authors include S. Shahrukh Hashmi, Susan K. Peterson, Claire N. Singletary, Jennifer Hoskovec, Patricia Devers, Michael J. Gambello, Helga V. Toriello, MaryAnn Campion, Jan Czerwiński and Karen L. Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as Genetics in Medicine, Journal of Child Neurology and Prenatal Diagnosis.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Noblin

24 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Sarah Noblin

PPCH

GENET

PHEOH

Jennifer Hoskovec United States

Katie Stoll United States

Bojana Brajenović‐Milić Croatia

Marsha Michie United States

Katelijne Bouman Netherlands

P Galéa United Kingdom

J. Halliday Australia

Alice M. Jaques Australia

M. H. Y. Tang China

Robin Forbes Australia

Jennifer Hoskovec United States

Sarah Noblin

317 ×1.3

PPCH

297 ×1.8

GENET

94 ×1.4

PHEOH

65 ×1.3

51 ×1.1

Citations per year, relative to Sarah Noblin Sarah Noblin (= 1×) peers Jennifer Hoskovec

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Noblin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Noblin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Noblin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Noblin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Noblin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Noblin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Noblin. The network helps show where Sarah Noblin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Noblin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Noblin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Noblin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Noblin. Sarah Noblin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Vilar, Eduardo, et al.. (2020). Patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency are interested in updated genetic testing. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 18(1). 19–19. 4 indexed citations

Williams, Danielle, et al.. (2020). Somatic mismatch repair testing in evaluation of Lynch syndrome: The gap between preferred and current practices. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 29(5). 728–736. 4 indexed citations

Hoskovec, Jennifer, et al.. (2020). Exploring experiences and expectations of prenatal health care and genetic counseling/testing in immigrant Latinas. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 29(4). 530–541. 12 indexed citations

Noblin, Sarah, et al.. (2019). Genetic Testing Practices of Genetic Counselors, Geneticists, and Pediatric Neurologists With Regard to Childhood-Onset Neurogenetic Conditions. Journal of Child Neurology. 34(4). 177–183. 6 indexed citations

Durham, L. Kathryn, Ramesha Papanna, Blair Stevens, et al.. (2019). The utilization of prenatal microarray: A survey of current genetic counseling practices and barriers. Prenatal Diagnosis. 39(5). 351–360. 9 indexed citations

Stevens, Blair, et al.. (2019). Introduction of cell‐free DNA screening is associated with changes in prenatal genetic counseling indications. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 28(3). 692–699. 3 indexed citations

Gerard, Amanda, Sarah Noblin, S. Shahrukh Hashmi, et al.. (2018). Undergraduate Student Perceptions and Awareness of Genetic Counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 28(1). 27–39. 12 indexed citations

Bojadzieva, Jasmina, et al.. (2017). The psychosocial effects of the Li-Fraumeni Education and Early Detection (LEAD) program on individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Genetics in Medicine. 19(9). 1064–1070. 29 indexed citations

Woodson, Ashley, Banu Arun, Carlos H. Bárcenas, et al.. (2017). Evaluating the NCCN Clinical Criteria for RecommendingBRCA1andBRCA2Genetic Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 15(6). 797–803. 7 indexed citations

10.

Cameron, Carrie, et al.. (2017). Attitudes Towards Prenatal Genetic Counseling, Prenatal Genetic Testing, and Termination of Pregnancy among Southeast and East Asian Women in the United States. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 26(5). 1041–1058. 18 indexed citations

11.

Whitty, Janice E., Sarah Noblin, Michael Covinsky, et al.. (2017). First Neonatal Demise with Travel-Associated Zika Virus Infection in the United States of America. American Journal of Perinatology Reports. 7(2). e68–e73. 11 indexed citations

12.

Senter, Leigha, Robin L. Bennett, Anne C. Madeo, et al.. (2017). National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics: Explication of 2017 Revisions. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 27(1). 9–15. 4 indexed citations

13.

Hashmi, S. Shahrukh, et al.. (2016). Knowledge and Self‐Esteem of Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Journal of Genetic Counseling. 26(3). 620–627. 16 indexed citations

14.

Broaddus, Russell R., Y. Nancy You, Sarah Noblin, et al.. (2014). Is it all Lynch syndrome?: An assessment of family history in individuals with mismatch repair–deficient tumors. Genetics in Medicine. 17(6). 476–484. 8 indexed citations

15.

Wilson, Karen L., Jan Czerwiński, Jennifer Hoskovec, et al.. (2012). NSGC Practice Guideline: Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Testing Options for Chromosome Aneuploidy. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 22(1). 4–15. 91 indexed citations

16.

Goka, T J, et al.. (2011). Exploring the Role of Religiosity and Spirituality in Amniocentesis Decision‐Making Among Latinas. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 20(6). 660–673. 25 indexed citations

17.

Canfield, Mark A., Stephen P. Daiger, Michael J. Gambello, et al.. (2010). Survival of Texas infants born with trisomies 21, 18, and 13. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 152A(2). 360–366. 71 indexed citations

18.

Northrup, Hope, et al.. (2009). Expanded newborn screening in Texas: a survey and educational module addressing the knowledge of pediatric residents. Genetics in Medicine. 11(3). 163–168. 3 indexed citations

19.

Gambello, Michael J., et al.. (2009). Fetal trisomy 21 and the risk of preeclampsia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 23(1). 55–59. 6 indexed citations

20.

Pletcher, Beth A., Helga V. Toriello, Sarah Noblin, et al.. (2007). Indications for genetic referral: a guide for healthcare providers. Genetics in Medicine. 9(6). 385–389. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact