Sarah McGill

2.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
57 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Sarah McGill is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah McGill has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Oncology, 14 papers in Surgery and 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sarah McGill's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (10 papers) and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (8 papers). Sarah McGill is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (10 papers) and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (8 papers). Sarah McGill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Sarah McGill's co-authors include Casey M. Theriot, Ajay Gulati, Michael Dougherty, Steve D. Oh, Cheryl Heiner, Joan Wong, Benjamin J. Callahan, Tonya Kaltenbach, Roy Soetikno and Εvangelos Εvangelou and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah McGill

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

High-throughput amplicon ... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 2023 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah McGill United States 12 342 326 271 183 141 57 1.1k
Michael Dougherty United States 12 288 0.8× 349 1.1× 149 0.5× 223 1.2× 141 1.0× 31 1.1k
Nicolas Zhou United States 12 128 0.4× 537 1.6× 198 0.7× 152 0.8× 188 1.3× 39 1.1k
Guoqin Yu United States 22 409 1.2× 1.4k 4.2× 263 1.0× 386 2.1× 70 0.5× 33 2.0k
Marc A. Sze United States 16 206 0.6× 1.2k 3.8× 587 2.2× 123 0.7× 95 0.7× 25 2.0k
Daniel Garza United States 19 169 0.5× 378 1.2× 156 0.6× 105 0.6× 236 1.7× 50 1.4k
Patrick Connor United States 13 124 0.4× 70 0.2× 187 0.7× 105 0.6× 72 0.5× 28 664
Christine Dominianni United States 10 403 1.2× 1.3k 4.1× 130 0.5× 201 1.1× 56 0.4× 15 1.9k
K. G. Mitchell United States 26 238 0.7× 149 0.5× 548 2.0× 423 2.3× 69 0.5× 164 2.1k
Anita Y. Voigt Germany 17 517 1.5× 1.3k 4.1× 109 0.4× 178 1.0× 193 1.4× 28 2.3k
Fevzi Altuntaş Türkiye 22 336 1.0× 113 0.3× 123 0.5× 159 0.9× 24 0.2× 178 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah McGill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah McGill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah McGill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah McGill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah McGill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah McGill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah McGill. The network helps show where Sarah McGill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah McGill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah McGill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah McGill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah McGill. Sarah McGill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
McGill, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Su1936 GASTROINTESTINAL DISTRESS IN ALPHA-GAL SYNDROME: RESULTS FROM A LARGE NATIONAL SURVEY. Gastroenterology. 166(5). S–876. 1 indexed citations
3.
Warner‐Smith, Matthew, Kan Ren, Richard I. Walton, et al.. (2024). Protocol for evaluating the fitness for purpose of an artificial intelligence product for radiology reporting in the BreastScreen New South Wales breast cancer screening programme. BMJ Open. 14(5). e082350–e082350. 1 indexed citations
4.
McGill, Sarah, et al.. (2024). S109 Itching for Therapy: Alpha-Gal Syndrome as a Cause of Anaphylaxis to Ustekinumab. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 119(12S). S29–S29.
5.
McGill, Sarah, Scott P. Commins, Anne F. Peery, et al.. (2023). Alpha-Gal Sensitization in a US Screening Population Is Not Associated With a Decreased Meat Intake or Gastrointestinal Symptoms. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 118(7). 1276–1281. 13 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Chris & Sarah McGill. (2023). Food Allergies and Alpha-gal Syndrome for the Gastroenterologist. Current Gastroenterology Reports. 25(2). 21–30. 3 indexed citations
7.
Foley, Matthew H., Morgan E. Walker, Allison K. Stewart, et al.. (2023). Bile salt hydrolases shape the bile acid landscape and restrict Clostridioides difficile growth in the murine gut. Nature Microbiology. 8(4). 611–628. 95 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
McGill, Sarah, Jana G. Hashash, & Thomas A.E. Platts‐Mills. (2023). AGA Clinical Practice Update on Alpha-Gal Syndrome for the GI Clinician: Commentary. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 21(4). 891–896. 25 indexed citations
10.
McGill, Sarah, Scott P. Commins, Temitope O. Keku, et al.. (2022). 645: ALPHA-GAL SENSITIZATION IS COMMON IN A COLONOSCOPY SCREENING POPULATION. Gastroenterology. 162(7). S–156. 3 indexed citations
11.
McGill, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Treatment Programs for Substance Use Disorder. Canadian Journal of Health Technologies. 1(6). 1 indexed citations
12.
McGill, Sarah, Rui Wang, Julian Rosenman, et al.. (2021). Colon10k: A Benchmark For Place Recognition In Colonoscopy. 1279–1283. 2 indexed citations
13.
McGill, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Artificial intelligence identifies and quantifies colonoscopy blind spots. Endoscopy. 53(12). 1284–1286. 12 indexed citations
14.
Croglio, Michael P., Scott P. Commins, & Sarah McGill. (2021). Isolated Gastrointestinal Alpha-gal Meat Allergy Is a Cause for Gastrointestinal Distress Without Anaphylaxis. Gastroenterology. 160(6). 2178–2180.e1. 23 indexed citations
15.
Wang, Rui, Yubo Zhang, Stephen M. Pizer, et al.. (2021). RNNSLAM: Reconstructing the 3D colon to visualize missing regions during a colonoscopy. Medical Image Analysis. 72. 102100–102100. 27 indexed citations
16.
Callahan, Benjamin J., Joan Wong, Cheryl Heiner, et al.. (2019). High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Research. 47(18). e103–e103. 433 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Logsdon, M. Cynthia, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Printed Health Education Materials for Use by Low‐Education Families. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(4). 218–228. 62 indexed citations
18.
McGill, Sarah, Εvangelos Εvangelou, John P. A. Ioannidis, Roy Soetikno, & Tonya Kaltenbach. (2013). Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 62(12). 1704–1713. 118 indexed citations
19.
McGill, Sarah, Roy Soetikno, Amit Rastogi, et al.. (2013). 354 Endoscopists Sustain High Accuracy and Negative Predictive Value of Optical Diagnosis for Colorectal Polyps Following Standardized and Continued Training. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 77(5). AB144–AB145. 2 indexed citations
20.
Kaltenbach, Tonya, et al.. (2011). Proficiency in the Diagnosis of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasm Yields High Adenoma Detection Rates. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 57(3). 764–770. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026