Sarah M. Clinton

5.1k citations
72 papers · 3.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 35

Sarah M. Clinton

71 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learning20102026201520202010200400600

Peers

Sarah M. Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 911
Replace Alfred J. Robison with:
Alfred J. Robison United States
Shannon L. Gourley United States
Michelle S. Mazei‐Robison United States
Rosemary C. Bagot Canada
Sayamwong E. Hammack United States
Ian Maze United States
Olivier George United States
Mark S. Ansorge United States
Sam A. Golden United States
Carlos A. Bolaños United States
Sarah M. Clinton relative to Alfred J. Robison United States Alfred J. Robison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alfred J. Robison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah M. Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah M. Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah M. Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah M. Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah M. Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah M. Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah M. Clinton. The network helps show where Sarah M. Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah M. Clinton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah M. Clinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah M. Clinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah M. Clinton. Sarah M. Clinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 3
3 7
4 7
5 6
6 15
7 2
8 15
9 20
10 12
11 32
12 30
13 34
14 54
15 120
16 71
17 26
18 50
19 56
20 94

About Sarah M. Clinton

Sarah M. Clinton is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Social Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (35 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (34 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (664 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.8k citations). Sarah M. Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Huda Akil, Stanley J. Watson, James H. Meador‐Woodruff, Shelly B. Flagel, Paul E. M. Phillips, Terry E. Robinson, Jeremy J. Clark, Ilan A. Kerman, Matthew E. Glover and Leah M. Mayo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026