Sarah Johnson

2.0k total citations
60 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sarah Johnson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Johnson has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 25 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Johnson's work include Ovarian function and disorders (17 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (15 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers). Sarah Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (17 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (15 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers). Sarah Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Sarah Johnson's co-authors include Christian Gnoth, Tina L. Cheng, Robert W. Blum, Michael J. Zinaman, Lorrae Marriott, Victoria Jennings, J Roos, Bola Grace, Julia Schiffner and Jayne E. Ellis and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Johnson

59 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Johnson United Kingdom 22 424 388 213 133 107 60 1.3k
Eleanor Brindle United States 20 327 0.8× 262 0.7× 106 0.5× 83 0.6× 150 1.4× 50 1.4k
Virginia J. Vitzthum United States 21 345 0.8× 188 0.5× 198 0.9× 142 1.1× 46 0.4× 78 1.3k
Jie Tang China 26 191 0.5× 189 0.5× 121 0.6× 139 1.0× 307 2.9× 73 2.4k
Darryl J. Holman United States 18 282 0.7× 271 0.7× 130 0.6× 23 0.2× 167 1.6× 37 1.3k
Rune Lindahl‐Jacobsen Denmark 29 253 0.6× 250 0.6× 311 1.5× 467 3.5× 297 2.8× 89 2.5k
R Hauspie Belgium 21 489 1.2× 118 0.3× 486 2.3× 122 0.9× 127 1.2× 54 1.7k
Kohta Suzuki Japan 23 660 1.6× 363 0.9× 498 2.3× 149 1.1× 107 1.0× 95 1.7k
Sławomir Kozieł Poland 25 695 1.6× 79 0.2× 516 2.4× 240 1.8× 139 1.3× 151 2.3k
Iwona Bojar Poland 19 328 0.8× 240 0.6× 156 0.7× 164 1.2× 70 0.7× 150 1.3k
Sylvia Kirchengast Austria 28 773 1.8× 656 1.7× 504 2.4× 219 1.6× 115 1.1× 163 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Johnson. The network helps show where Sarah Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Johnson. Sarah Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2025). Understanding Changes in Global Behavior Due to ControlLocation. 83–92. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ortega, Claudia, Yael Eshet, Anca Prica, et al.. (2023). Combination of FDG PET/CT Radiomics and Clinical Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Cancers. 15(7). 2056–2056. 14 indexed citations
3.
Johnson, Sarah, Sharon Bond, Bola Grace, & Lorrae Marriott. (2022). Increased Chance of Live Birth Following Use of Connected Ovulation Test System: Outcome Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Women s Health Reports. 3(1). 60–66. 3 indexed citations
4.
Gadsby, Roger, et al.. (2021). The onset of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 21(1). 10–10. 7 indexed citations
5.
Marriott, Lorrae, et al.. (2020). Jointly modelling longitudinally measured urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin and early pregnancy outcomes. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 4589–4589. 2 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2019). Increased Likelihood of Pregnancy Using an App-Connected Ovulation Test System: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Women s Health. 29(1). 84–90. 22 indexed citations
7.
Swan, Sarah, Alison O’Neill, Sarah Johnson, et al.. (2019). Variability of Amnesic Shellfish Toxin and Pseudo-nitzschia occurrence in bivalve molluscs and water samples–Analysis of ten years of the official control monitoring programme. Harmful Algae. 87. 101623–101623. 19 indexed citations
8.
Buck, David G., David C. Evers, Evan M. Adams, et al.. (2019). A global-scale assessment of fish mercury concentrations and the identification of biological hotspots. The Science of The Total Environment. 687. 956–966. 45 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Georgina, et al.. (2015). Women’s experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis. Reproductive Health. 12(1). 116–116. 8 indexed citations
12.
Roos, J, Sarah Johnson, Erhard Godehardt, et al.. (2015). Monitoring the menstrual cycle: Comparison of urinary and serum reproductive hormones referenced to true ovulation. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 20(6). 438–450. 85 indexed citations
13.
Turner, Andrew D., et al.. (2015). Testing and application of a refined rapid detection method for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in UK shellfish. Toxicon. 100. 32–41. 14 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, Sarah, Robert W. Blum, & Tina L. Cheng. (2014). Future orientation: a construct with implications for adolescent health and wellbeing. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 26(4). 459–468. 148 indexed citations
15.
Gnoth, Christian & Sarah Johnson. (2014). Strips of Hope: Accuracy of Home Pregnancy Tests and New Developments. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 74(7). 661–669. 79 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2013). Accuracy of a home-based device for giving an early estimate of pregnancy duration compared with reference methods. Fertility and Sterility. 100(6). 1635–1641.e1. 5 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2013). Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America. Reproductive Health. 10(1). 7–7. 74 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2012). Women's views on fertility and conception in five countries. Fertility and Sterility. 98(3). S233–S233. 1 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2010). Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 27(2). 393–401. 11 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Sarah, et al.. (2010). Attitudes and Experience of Women to Common Vaginal Infections. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 14(4). 287–294. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026