Sarah Jo Stephens

26 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Sarah Jo Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Otorhinolaryngology 18
  • Hepatology 29
  • Oncology 87
  • Cancer Research 46
Replace Beth E. Erickson with:
Beth E. Erickson United States
Andrea D’Aviero Italy
Hongying Lv China
Maura Campitelli Italy
Boone Wilder Goodgame United States
Maiwand Ahmadsei Switzerland
Wataru Takayama Japan
Mitchell S. von Itzstein United States
Tomoya Tago Japan
Yiwey Shieh United States
Sarah Jo Stephens relative to Beth E. Erickson United States Beth E. Erickson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Beth E. Erickson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Jo Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Jo Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Jo Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Jo Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Jo Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Jo Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Jo Stephens. The network helps show where Sarah Jo Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Jo Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Jo Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Jo Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202069
2 201568
3 200853
4 201840
5 201738
6 201537
7 201829
8 202019
9 201913
10 202211
11 20169
12 20229
13 20217
14 20245
15 20234
16 20233
17 20243
18 20232
19 19881
20 20021

About Sarah Jo Stephens

Sarah Jo Stephens is a scholar working on Hepatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Health Informatics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (2 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (24 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (18 citations), Hepatology (29 citations), Oncology (87 citations) and Cancer Research (46 citations). Sarah Jo Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Manisha Palta, Brian G. Czito, Christopher G. Willett, Joseph Kamel Salama, Ethan Bernard Ludmir, Michael James Moravan, Yvonne Marie Mowery, Ryan E. Henry, R París and Donna Niedzwiecki. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Cancer, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy and Journal of Oncology Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact