Sarah Incel
About
In The Last Decade
Sarah Incel
11 papers receiving 441 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Geophysics 423
- Mechanics of Materials 30
- Artificial Intelligence 15
- Atmospheric Science 15
- Environmental Chemistry 9
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Incel
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Incel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Incel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Incel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Incel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Incel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Incel. The network helps show where Sarah Incel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Incel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Incel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Incel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Incel. Sarah Incel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 164 | |
| 11 | 85 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.