Sarah E Siegrist

1.6k total citations
19 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Sarah E Siegrist is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah E Siegrist has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Sarah E Siegrist's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers) and Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (6 papers). Sarah E Siegrist is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers) and Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (6 papers). Sarah E Siegrist collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Sarah E Siegrist's co-authors include Chris Q. Doe, Cheng‐Yu Lee, Robin P. Wharton, Chun‐Hong Chen, Bruce A. Hay, Iswar K. Hariharan, Beth Stronach, Mary C. Beckerle, Susan E. Doyle and Matthew C. Pahl and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Genes & Development and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah E Siegrist

17 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah E Siegrist United States	13	832	551	324	152	137	19	1.1k
Ana Carmena Spain	16	1.2k 1.4×	408 0.7×	459 1.4×	118 0.8×	181 1.3×	30	1.4k
Catarina C. F. Homem Portugal	13	884 1.1×	461 0.8×	344 1.1×	122 0.8×	133 1.0×	22	1.3k
Grégory Emery Canada	17	1.1k 1.3×	931 1.7×	317 1.0×	127 0.8×	176 1.3×	34	1.6k
Roger Albertson United States	11	808 1.0×	793 1.4×	177 0.5×	118 0.8×	81 0.6×	12	1.3k
Michel Gho France	13	875 1.1×	444 0.8×	395 1.2×	109 0.7×	106 0.8×	18	1.1k
Takahiro Chihara Japan	23	767 0.9×	327 0.6×	376 1.2×	77 0.5×	199 1.5×	53	1.3k
Catherine M. Davidson United Kingdom	12	830 1.0×	514 0.9×	187 0.6×	144 0.9×	94 0.7×	14	1.3k
Alice Krudewig Switzerland	11	806 1.0×	585 1.1×	300 0.9×	36 0.2×	118 0.9×	11	1.2k
Peter Duchek Austria	13	887 1.1×	482 0.9×	572 1.8×	135 0.9×	310 2.3×	21	1.5k
Clemens Cabernard United States	21	1.2k 1.4×	1.0k 1.8×	260 0.8×	196 1.3×	110 0.8×	33	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E Siegrist

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E Siegrist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E Siegrist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E Siegrist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E Siegrist

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E Siegrist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E Siegrist. The network helps show where Sarah E Siegrist may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah E Siegrist

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah E Siegrist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah E Siegrist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah E Siegrist. Sarah E Siegrist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2024). Delta-dependent Notch activation closes the early neuroblast temporal program to promote lineage progression and neurogenesis termination in Drosophila. eLife. 12.

Worley, Melanie I., et al.. (2024). Spatiotemporal control of cell ablation using Ronidazole with Nitroreductase in Drosophila. Developmental Biology. 520. 31–40.

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2023). Delta-dependent Notch activation closes the early neuroblast temporal program to promote lineage progression and neurogenesis termination in Drosophila. eLife. 12. 2 indexed citations

Cocanougher, Ben, Xin Yuan, Andrea B. Kohn, et al.. (2022). Single cell RNA-seq analysis reveals temporally-regulated and quiescence-regulated gene expression in Drosophila larval neuroblasts. Neural Development. 17(1). 7–7. 15 indexed citations

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2022). Notch signaling regulates neural stem cell quiescence entry and exit in Drosophila. Development. 149(4). 11 indexed citations

Yuan, Xin, Conor W. Sipe, Miyuki Suzawa, Michelle L. Bland, & Sarah E Siegrist. (2020). Dilp-2–mediated PI3-kinase activation coordinates reactivation of quiescent neuroblasts with growth of their glial stem cell niche. PLoS Biology. 18(5). e3000721–e3000721. 21 indexed citations

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2020). Steroid hormones, dietary nutrients, and temporal progression of neurogenesis. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 43. 70–77. 8 indexed citations

Pahl, Matthew C., Susan E. Doyle, & Sarah E Siegrist. (2019). E93 Integrates Neuroblast Intrinsic State with Developmental Time to Terminate MB Neurogenesis via Autophagy. Current Biology. 29(5). 750–762.e3. 41 indexed citations

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2017). Neuroblast niche position is controlled by Phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent DE-Cadherin adhesion. Journal of Cell Science. 130(6). e1.1–e1.1. 7 indexed citations

10.

Doyle, Susan E., et al.. (2017). Neuroblast niche position is controlled by PI3-kinase dependent DE-Cadherin adhesion. Development. 144(5). 820–829. 14 indexed citations

11.

Sipe, Conor W. & Sarah E Siegrist. (2017). Eyeless uncouples mushroom body neuroblast proliferation from dietary amino acids in Drosophila. eLife. 6. 14 indexed citations

12.

Janssens, Derek H., Danielle C. Hamm, Xiao Qi, et al.. (2017). An Hdac1/Rpd3-Poised Circuit Balances Continual Self-Renewal and Rapid Restriction of Developmental Potential during Asymmetric Stem Cell Division. Developmental Cell. 40(4). 367–380.e7. 28 indexed citations

13.

Siegrist, Sarah E, et al.. (2010). Inactivation of Both foxo and reaper Promotes Long-Term Adult Neurogenesis in Drosophila. Current Biology. 20(7). 643–648. 142 indexed citations

14.

Siegrist, Sarah E & Chris Q. Doe. (2007). Microtubule-induced cortical cell polarity. Genes & Development. 21(5). 483–496. 189 indexed citations

15.

Lee, Cheng‐Yu, et al.. (2006). Brat Is a Miranda Cargo Protein that Promotes Neuronal Differentiation and Inhibits Neuroblast Self-Renewal. Developmental Cell. 10(4). 441–449. 249 indexed citations

16.

Siegrist, Sarah E & Chris Q. Doe. (2006). Extrinsic cues orient the cell division axis inDrosophilaembryonic neuroblasts. Development. 133(3). 529–536. 97 indexed citations

17.

Siegrist, Sarah E & Chris Q. Doe. (2005). Microtubule-Induced Pins/Gαi Cortical Polarity in Drosophila Neuroblasts. Cell. 123(7). 1323–1335. 206 indexed citations

18.

Renfranz, Patricia J., Sarah E Siegrist, Beth Stronach, Teresita Macalma, & Mary C. Beckerle. (2003). Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Zyx102, a Drosophila orthologue of the zyxin family that interacts with Drosophila Enabled. Gene. 305(1). 13–26. 14 indexed citations

19.

Stronach, Beth, Sarah E Siegrist, & Mary C. Beckerle. (1996). Two muscle-specific LIM proteins in Drosophila.. The Journal of Cell Biology. 134(5). 1179–1195. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact