Sarah E. Macdonald

785 total citations
10 papers, 535 citations indexed

About

Sarah E. Macdonald is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah E. Macdonald has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 535 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Small Animals, 8 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Sarah E. Macdonald's work include Coccidia and coccidiosis research (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers) and Helminth infection and control (6 papers). Sarah E. Macdonald is often cited by papers focused on Coccidia and coccidiosis research (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers) and Helminth infection and control (6 papers). Sarah E. Macdonald collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Tanzania. Sarah E. Macdonald's co-authors include Damer P. Blake, Fiona M. Tomley, Richard A. Stabler, David Hume, Matthew J. Nolan, Kay Boulton, Emily L. Clark, P. S. Banerjee, Virginia Marugán‐Hernández and Rajat Garg and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Sarah E. Macdonald

10 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Macdonald

ASZ

SA

PARAS

MB

ID

Petra Ganas Austria

D S Chandler Australia

R. N. Marshall United Kingdom

VA Fahy Australia

Andréas Lazaros Chryssafidis Brazil

Emrah Şimşek Türkiye

S.D. Folz United States

Josef Bachmeier Germany

Muhammad Tahir Aleem China

Yazmín Alcalá-Canto Mexico

Petra Ganas Austria

Sarah E. Macdonald

185 ×0.5

ASZ

145 ×0.5

SA

152 ×1.2

PARAS

133 ×2.1

MB

26 ×0.7

ID

Citations per year, relative to Sarah E. Macdonald Sarah E. Macdonald (= 1×) peers Petra Ganas

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Macdonald

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Macdonald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Macdonald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Macdonald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Macdonald

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Macdonald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Macdonald. The network helps show where Sarah E. Macdonald may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah E. Macdonald

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah E. Macdonald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah E. Macdonald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah E. Macdonald. Sarah E. Macdonald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Pastor‐Fernández, Iván, et al.. (2019). Laboratory Growth and Genetic Manipulation of Eimeria tenella. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 53(1). e81–e81. 31 indexed citations

2.

Macdonald, Sarah E., Pauline M. van Diemen, Henny Martineau, et al.. (2018). Impact of Eimeria tenella Coinfection on Campylobacter jejuni Colonization of the Chicken. Infection and Immunity. 87(2). 33 indexed citations

3.

Macdonald, Sarah E., Matthew J. Nolan, Kay Boulton, et al.. (2017). Effects of Eimeria tenella infection on chicken caecal microbiome diversity, exploring variation associated with severity of pathology. PLoS ONE. 12(9). e0184890–e0184890. 141 indexed citations

4.

Silva, Liliana M. R., et al.. (2017). A newly described strain of Eimeria arloingi (strain A) belongs to the phylogenetic group of ruminant-infecting pathogenic species, which replicate in host endothelial cells in vivo. Veterinary Parasitology. 248. 28–32. 11 indexed citations

5.

Macdonald, Sarah E., Ozan Gundogdu, Nick Dorrell, et al.. (2017). Draft Genome Sequence of Campylobacter jejuni 11168H. Genome Announcements. 5(5). 3 indexed citations

6.

Marugán‐Hernández, Virginia, et al.. (2016). Viral proteins expressed in the protozoan parasite Eimeria tenella are detected by the chicken immune system. Parasites & Vectors. 9(1). 463–463. 39 indexed citations

7.

Blake, Damer P., Emily L. Clark, Sarah E. Macdonald, et al.. (2015). Population, genetic, and antigenic diversity of the apicomplexanEimeria tenellaand their relevance to vaccine development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(38). E5343–50. 93 indexed citations

8.

Fornace, Kimberly, Emily L. Clark, Sarah E. Macdonald, et al.. (2013). Occurrence of Eimeria Species Parasites on Small-Scale Commercial Chicken Farms in Africa and Indication of Economic Profitability. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e84254–e84254. 37 indexed citations

9.

Yadav, Saroj Kumar, Rajat Garg, Emily L. Clark, et al.. (2013). An optimised protocol for molecular identification of Eimeria from chickens. Veterinary Parasitology. 199(1-2). 24–31. 65 indexed citations

10.

Wang, Dai, Mads Gabrielsen, Katherine S. H. Beckham, et al.. (2011). Identification of Bacterial Target Proteins for the Salicylidene Acylhydrazide Class of Virulence-blocking Compounds. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(34). 29922–29931. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact