Sarah E. Goode

569 citations
16 papers · 412 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 5%
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
    • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
    • Body Contouring and Surgery
    • Esophageal and GI Pathology

Papers in

    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 6
    • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 2
    • Body Contouring and Surgery 2
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 10

Sarah E. Goode

16 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Goode
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Hepatology 257
  • Surgery 331
  • Epidemiology 227
  • Pharmacy 19
  • Gastroenterology 20
Replace Thomas Cerabona with:
Thomas Cerabona United States
Enad Dawod United States
Pamela Moser Italy
D Pezet France
Juan Carlos Quer Spain
Eva Kieslichová Czechia
B. Goubaux France
Luke T. Evans United States
M. Blaise France
A.D. Pinna Italy
Sarah E. Goode relative to Thomas Cerabona United States Thomas Cerabona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Thomas Cerabona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Goode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Goode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Goode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Goode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Goode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Goode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Goode. The network helps show where Sarah E. Goode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Goode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Goode Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Goode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199678
2 199766
3 200062
4 199738
5 199733
6 199724
7 199523
8 199417
9
Peritoneovenous shunts in patients with intractable ascites: palliation at what price?
199713
10 199811
11 199611
12 199511
13 199611
14 19986
15 19974
16 19954

About Sarah E. Goode

Sarah E. Goode is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology, Epidemiology, Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 16 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (10 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (2 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (1 paper) and Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (257 citations), Surgery (331 citations), Epidemiology (227 citations), Pharmacy (19 citations) and Gastroenterology (20 citations). Sarah E. Goode has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander S. Rosemurgy, Thomas J. Black, Emmanuel E. Zervos, Bruce Zwiebel, Mark Bloomston, Patrick Brady, Francesco M. Serafini, H. Juergen Nord, John F. Sweeney and Robert E. Kearney. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Surgery and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact