Sarah Benson‐Amram
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Developmental Biology top 1%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kay E. HolekampBen DantzerEli M. SwansonLauren A. StantonMary L. WeldeleVirginia K. HeinenAmy T. GilbertKaren McComb
- Topics
- Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers)Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sarah Benson‐Amram
24 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Social Psychology 638
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 612
- Ecology 349
- Developmental Biology 207
- Genetics 193
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Benson‐Amram
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Benson‐Amram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Benson‐Amram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Benson‐Amram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Benson‐Amram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Benson‐Amram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Benson‐Amram. The network helps show where Sarah Benson‐Amram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Benson‐Amram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Benson‐Amram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Benson‐Amram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Benson‐Amram. Sarah Benson‐Amram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivoresbreakdown → | 241 |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 107 | |
| 19 | 98 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Sarah Benson‐Amram
Sarah Benson‐Amram is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Small Animals, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (207 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (612 citations) and Social Psychology (638 citations). Sarah Benson‐Amram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kay E. Holekamp, Ben Dantzer, Eli M. Swanson, Lauren A. Stanton, Mary L. Weldele, Virginia K. Heinen, Amy T. Gilbert, Karen McComb, Kevin R. Theis and Kenyon B. De Greene. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.