Sarah Ben Amor

565 total citations
27 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

Sarah Ben Amor is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Ben Amor has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Sarah Ben Amor's work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (16 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers). Sarah Ben Amor is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (16 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers). Sarah Ben Amor collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Brazil and France. Sarah Ben Amor's co-authors include Ahmet Kandakoğlu, Anissa Frini, Renata Pelissari, Maria Célia de Oliveira, André Luís Helleno, Jean‐Marc Martel, Boumediene Ramdani, Ramzi Benkraiem, Khaled Guesmi and Fateh Bélaïd and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Applied Soft Computing and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Ben Amor

25 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Ben Amor Canada 9 206 74 57 46 40 27 371
Ahmet Kandakoğlu Türkiye 7 209 1.0× 65 0.9× 54 0.9× 27 0.6× 68 1.7× 9 432
Arijit Ghosh India 11 157 0.8× 47 0.6× 64 1.1× 44 1.0× 62 1.6× 16 464
Jiahang Yuan China 13 244 1.2× 62 0.8× 78 1.4× 34 0.7× 76 1.9× 27 589
Peiyu Ren China 11 162 0.8× 54 0.7× 80 1.4× 41 0.9× 95 2.4× 50 520
Fuqi Liang Netherlands 6 279 1.4× 53 0.7× 90 1.6× 37 0.8× 107 2.7× 8 478
Boris Yatsalo Russia 12 193 0.9× 56 0.8× 76 1.3× 76 1.7× 36 0.9× 32 395
Maciej Nowak Poland 9 281 1.4× 50 0.7× 84 1.5× 22 0.5× 31 0.8× 39 373
Fengjia Guo China 12 208 1.0× 86 1.2× 83 1.5× 25 0.5× 23 0.6× 21 407
Majeed Heydari Iran 6 246 1.2× 36 0.5× 82 1.4× 53 1.2× 59 1.5× 11 503
Vesko Lukovac Serbia 10 298 1.4× 53 0.7× 93 1.6× 27 0.6× 107 2.7× 16 531

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Ben Amor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Ben Amor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Ben Amor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Ben Amor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Ben Amor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Ben Amor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Ben Amor. The network helps show where Sarah Ben Amor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Ben Amor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Ben Amor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Ben Amor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Ben Amor. Sarah Ben Amor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Conceição, Samuel Vieira, et al.. (2025). The hierarchical and stochastic VIKOR to deal with imprecise and missing information. Applied Soft Computing. 180. 113340–113340.
2.
Pacheco‐Brousseau, Lissa, Dawn Stacey, François Desmeules, et al.. (2024). Determining Appropriateness of Total Joint Arthroplasty for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Patient‐Centred Conceptual Model. Musculoskeletal Care. 22(3). e1927–e1927. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pelissari, Renata, Sarah Ben Amor, Álvaro de Oliveira D’Antona, Eduardo Marandola, & Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte. (2024). A semi-supervised multi-criteria sorting approach to constructing social vulnerability composite indicators. Annals of Operations Research. 337(1). 235–260. 2 indexed citations
4.
Conceição, Samuel Vieira, et al.. (2023). A multiple criteria framework to assess learning methodologies. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 48. 101290–101290. 3 indexed citations
5.
Pacheco‐Brousseau, Lissa, et al.. (2023). Exploring appropriateness criteria for informing the total knee arthroplasty decision‐making process: An interpretive descriptive study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 29(6). 942–954. 2 indexed citations
6.
Pacheco‐Brousseau, Lissa, Dawn Stacey, François Desmeules, Sarah Ben Amor, & Stéphane Poitras. (2023). Response to commentary on ‘Instruments to assess appropriateness of hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review’. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 31(7). 999–1000. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pacheco‐Brousseau, Lissa, Dawn Stacey, François Desmeules, et al.. (2023). Instruments to assess appropriateness of hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 31(7). 847–864. 9 indexed citations
8.
Pacheco‐Brousseau, Lissa, Dawn Stacey, Sarah Ben Amor, & Stéphane Poitras. (2022). Shared decision-making conceptual models for physiotherapy: a theory analysis. Physiotherapy. 115. 111–118. 2 indexed citations
9.
Walther, Grit, et al.. (2022). A robust multicriteria clustering methodology for portfolio decision analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 174. 108803–108803. 8 indexed citations
10.
Amor, Sarah Ben, Anissa Frini, & Gilles Reinhardt. (2020). Preface: multiple criteria decision making for sustainable decisions. Annals of Operations Research. 293(2). 401–403. 2 indexed citations
11.
Amor, Sarah Ben, et al.. (2020). Framework for Drug Formulary Decision Using Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis. Medical Decision Making. 40(4). 438–447. 2 indexed citations
12.
Pelissari, Renata, et al.. (2019). A new FlowSort-based method to deal with information imperfections in sorting decision-making problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 276(1). 235–246. 41 indexed citations
13.
Pelissari, Renata, Maria Célia de Oliveira, Sarah Ben Amor, Ahmet Kandakoğlu, & André Luís Helleno. (2019). SMAA methods and their applications: a literature review and future research directions. Annals of Operations Research. 293(2). 433–493. 107 indexed citations
14.
Amor, Sarah Ben, Bruno Urli, & Anissa Frini. (2019). PROMETHEE-MP: a generalisation of PROMETHEE for multi-period evaluations under uncertainty. 8(1). 13–13. 3 indexed citations
15.
Amor, Sarah Ben, et al.. (2016). The value of additional information in multicriteria decision making choice problems with information imperfections. Annals of Operations Research. 253(1). 61–76. 7 indexed citations
16.
Amor, Sarah Ben, Adel Guitouni, & Jean‐Marc Martel. (2015). A Synthesis of Information Imperfection Representations for Decision Aid. INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research. 53(2). 68–77. 5 indexed citations
17.
Amor, Sarah Ben & Jean‐Marc Martel. (2014). A new distance measure including the weak preference relation: Application to the multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research. 237(3). 1165–1169. 8 indexed citations
18.
Amor, Sarah Ben, et al.. (2013). An extension of PROMETHEE with evidential evaluations. 20. 1–6.
19.
Amor, Sarah Ben & Bertrand Mareschal. (2012). Integrating imperfection of information into the promethee multicriteria decision aid methods: a general framework. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences. 37(1). 9–23. 5 indexed citations
20.
Amor, Sarah Ben & Jean‐Marc Martel. (2005). Multiple criteria analysis in the context of information imperfections: Processing of additional information. Operational Research. 5(3). 395–417. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026