Sarah A. Stamper

1.1k total citations
22 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Sarah A. Stamper is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah A. Stamper has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 10 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in Sarah A. Stamper's work include Marine animal studies overview (10 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (10 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (5 papers). Sarah A. Stamper is often cited by papers focused on Marine animal studies overview (10 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (10 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (5 papers). Sarah A. Stamper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Sarah A. Stamper's co-authors include Eric S. Fortune, Noah J. Cowan, James A. Simmons, Mary Ellen Bates, Maurice J. Chacron, Eatai Roth, Manu S. Madhav, Katrin Vonderschen, Caroline M. DeLong and Whitlow W. L. Au and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Scientific Reports and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Sarah A. Stamper

22 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah A. Stamper United States 16 233 225 171 155 143 22 655
Joachim Mogdans Germany 20 201 0.9× 378 1.7× 518 3.0× 187 1.2× 96 0.7× 42 1.1k
Jacob Engelmann Germany 20 166 0.7× 764 3.4× 352 2.1× 98 0.6× 132 0.9× 60 1.3k
Frederike D. Hanke Germany 16 146 0.6× 99 0.4× 324 1.9× 247 1.6× 105 0.7× 44 854
Sietse M. van Netten Netherlands 20 273 1.2× 194 0.9× 316 1.8× 45 0.3× 79 0.6× 36 1.5k
Peter H. Hartline United States 17 231 1.0× 110 0.5× 207 1.2× 285 1.8× 359 2.5× 26 1.0k
Randy Zelick United States 13 52 0.2× 226 1.0× 204 1.2× 247 1.6× 58 0.4× 18 683
Bart R. H. Geurten Germany 16 186 0.8× 60 0.3× 72 0.4× 161 1.0× 342 2.4× 30 638
Theresa Burt de Perera United Kingdom 18 151 0.6× 328 1.5× 311 1.8× 219 1.4× 61 0.4× 41 864
Robert C. Hinz Portugal 5 92 0.4× 162 0.7× 138 0.8× 259 1.7× 95 0.7× 6 926
Roger D. Santer United Kingdom 18 250 1.1× 40 0.2× 64 0.4× 331 2.1× 384 2.7× 37 827

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah A. Stamper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah A. Stamper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah A. Stamper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah A. Stamper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah A. Stamper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah A. Stamper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah A. Stamper. The network helps show where Sarah A. Stamper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah A. Stamper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah A. Stamper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah A. Stamper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah A. Stamper. Sarah A. Stamper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Sefati, Shahin, et al.. (2020). Variability in locomotor dynamics reveals the critical role of feedback in task control. eLife. 9. 12 indexed citations
3.
Goldstein, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Patient Satisfaction With Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling in a Cohort of Ethnically Diverse and Rural Women in Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 24(4). 349–352. 7 indexed citations
4.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2019). Sensory Cues Modulate Smooth Pursuit and Active Sensing Movements. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 13. 59–59. 10 indexed citations
5.
Biswas, Debojyoti, et al.. (2018). Closed-Loop Control of Active Sensing Movements Regulates Sensory Slip. Current Biology. 28(24). 4029–4036.e4. 25 indexed citations
6.
Madhav, Manu S., et al.. (2018). High-resolution behavioral mapping of electric fishes in Amazonian habitats. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 5830–5830. 13 indexed citations
7.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2016). Dynamic modulation of visual and electrosensory gains for locomotor control. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 13(118). 20160057–20160057. 21 indexed citations
8.
Cowan, Noah J., Mustafa Mert Ankaralı, Jonathan P. Dyhr, et al.. (2014). Feedback Control as a Framework for Understanding Tradeoffs in Biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 54(2). 223–237. 76 indexed citations
9.
Madhav, Manu S., Sarah A. Stamper, Eric S. Fortune, & Noah J. Cowan. (2013). Closed-loop stabilization of the jamming avoidance response reveals its locally unstable and globally nonlinear dynamics. Journal of Experimental Biology. 216(Pt 22). 4272–84. 20 indexed citations
10.
Stamper, Sarah A., Eric S. Fortune, & Maurice J. Chacron. (2013). Perception and coding of envelopes in weakly electric fishes. Journal of Experimental Biology. 216(13). 2393–2402. 37 indexed citations
11.
Stamper, Sarah A., Manu S. Madhav, Noah J. Cowan, & Eric S. Fortune. (2012). Beyond the Jamming Avoidance Response: weakly electric fish respond to the envelope of social electrosensory signals. Journal of Experimental Biology. 215(23). 4196–4207. 31 indexed citations
12.
Bauer, Gordon B., et al.. (2012). Tactile discrimination of textures by Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Marine Mammal Science. 28(4). 15 indexed citations
13.
Fellner, Wendi, et al.. (2012). The development of synchronous movement by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Marine Mammal Science. 29(3). 19 indexed citations
14.
Stamper, Sarah A., Eatai Roth, Noah J. Cowan, & Eric S. Fortune. (2012). Active sensing via movement shapes spatiotemporal patterns of sensory feedback. Journal of Experimental Biology. 215(9). 1567–1574. 50 indexed citations
15.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2009). Effects of Restraint and Immobilization on Electrosensory Behaviors of Weakly Electric Fish. ILAR Journal. 50(4). 361–372. 70 indexed citations
16.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2009). Species differences in group size and electrosensory interference in weakly electric fishes: Implications for electrosensory processing. Behavioural Brain Research. 207(2). 368–376. 40 indexed citations
17.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2008). Role of broadcast harmonics in echo delay perception by big brown bats. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 195(1). 79–89. 22 indexed citations
18.
Horowitz, Seth S., Sarah A. Stamper, & James A. Simmons. (2008). Neuronal connexin expression in the cochlear nucleus of big brown bats. Brain Research. 1197. 76–84. 10 indexed citations
19.
Stamper, Sarah A., et al.. (2008). Detection of targets colocalized in clutter by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 124(1). 667–673. 7 indexed citations
20.
DeLong, Caroline M., Whitlow W. L. Au, & Sarah A. Stamper. (2007). Echo features used by human listeners to discriminate among objects that vary in material or wall thickness: Implications for echolocating dolphins. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 121(1). 605–617. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026