Sara Wylie

1.2k total citations
35 papers, 584 citations indexed

About

Sara Wylie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara Wylie has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 584 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Sara Wylie's work include Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (9 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (7 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers). Sara Wylie is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (9 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (7 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers). Sara Wylie collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Sara Wylie's co-authors include Anna J. Willow, Kirk Jalbert, Matt Ratto, Max Liboiron, Len Albright, Lindsey Dillon, Nicholas Shapiro, Phil Brown, Rebecca Lave and Jill Kriesky and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Sara Wylie

35 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara Wylie United States 12 275 156 93 73 71 35 584
Kirk Jalbert United States 11 164 0.6× 134 0.9× 68 0.7× 31 0.4× 30 0.4× 22 369
Wendy Steele Australia 18 309 1.1× 245 1.6× 65 0.7× 166 2.3× 171 2.4× 65 1.1k
Natalie Osborne Australia 14 192 0.7× 81 0.5× 48 0.5× 53 0.7× 85 1.2× 34 497
Ruth Potts United Kingdom 14 142 0.5× 148 0.9× 56 0.6× 19 0.3× 55 0.8× 35 707
Sebastián Ureta Chile 15 221 0.8× 55 0.4× 53 0.6× 54 0.7× 121 1.7× 38 575
Elena Louder United States 11 258 0.9× 397 2.5× 24 0.3× 37 0.5× 55 0.8× 12 875
Ted Nordhaus United States 8 288 1.0× 177 1.1× 30 0.3× 53 0.7× 37 0.5× 14 794
Cindy Isenhour United States 17 168 0.6× 165 1.1× 30 0.3× 43 0.6× 35 0.5× 43 821
Juha Hiedanpää Finland 15 123 0.4× 414 2.7× 78 0.8× 56 0.8× 41 0.6× 58 731
Katharine N. Farrell Germany 15 210 0.8× 288 1.8× 90 1.0× 16 0.2× 85 1.2× 40 784

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Wylie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Wylie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Wylie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Wylie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Wylie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Wylie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Wylie. The network helps show where Sara Wylie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Wylie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Wylie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Wylie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Wylie. Sara Wylie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wylie, Sara, et al.. (2023). “Become a Gas Leak Detective!” Evaluating a multigenerational citizen science program for connecting distribution pipelines to energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science. 105. 103251–103251. 2 indexed citations
2.
Allison, Gary W., et al.. (2023). Increases in trade secret designations in hydraulic fracturing fluids and their potential implications for environmental health and water quality. Journal of Environmental Management. 351. 119611–119611. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kelly, Sophie, et al.. (2023). What Does Chelsea Creek Do for You? A Relational Approach to Environmental Justice Communication. Environmental Justice. 17(1). 67–78. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cooper, Seth, et al.. (2022). An effective online platform for crowd classification of coastal wetland loss. Conservation Science and Practice. 5(1). 3 indexed citations
5.
Specht, Aaron J., et al.. (2022). Lead and other toxic metals in plastic play foods: Results from testing citizen science, lead detection tools in childcare settings. Journal of Environmental Management. 321. 115904–115904. 6 indexed citations
6.
Allison, Gary W., et al.. (2022). Outcomes of the Halliburton Loophole: Chemicals regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act in US fracking disclosures, 2014–2021. Environmental Pollution. 322. 120552–120552. 5 indexed citations
7.
Wylie, Sara, et al.. (2022). Performance of Paid and Volunteer Image Labeling in Citizen Science — A Retrospective Analysis. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. 10(1). 64–73. 2 indexed citations
8.
Nost, Eric, et al.. (2021). Visualizing changes to US federal environmental agency websites, 2016–2020. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0246450–e0246450. 6 indexed citations
9.
Zhang, Yang, Steve Smith, Michelle L. Bell, et al.. (2021). Pollution inequality 50 years after the Clean Air Act: the need for hyperlocal data and action. Environmental Research Letters. 16(7). 71001–71001. 10 indexed citations
10.
Wylie, Sara, et al.. (2021). Exploring Q-Learning for Adaptive Difficulty in a Tile-based Image Labeling Game. 1–8. 1 indexed citations
11.
Senier, Laura, et al.. (2020). Learning in Crisis: Training Students to Monitor and Address Irresponsible Knowledge Construction by US Federal Agencies under Trump. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 81–93. 3 indexed citations
12.
Liboiron, Max, et al.. (2019). Seeing power with a flashlight: DIY thermal sensing technology in the classroom. Social Studies of Science. 49(1). 3–28. 7 indexed citations
13.
Michanowicz, Drew R., et al.. (2019). Photopaper as a tool for community-level monitoring of industrially produced hydrogen sulfide and corrosion. Atmospheric Environment X. 5. 100049–100049. 5 indexed citations
14.
Wylie, Sara, et al.. (2018). Does Flight Path Context Matter? Impact on Worker Performance in Crowdsourced Aerial Imagery Analysis.. ISCRAM. 1 indexed citations
15.
Dillon, Lindsey, Christopher Sellers, Nicholas Shapiro, et al.. (2018). The Environmental Protection Agency in the Early Trump Administration: Prelude to Regulatory Capture. American Journal of Public Health. 108(S2). S89–S94. 44 indexed citations
16.
Wylie, Sara. (2018). Fractivism. 1 indexed citations
17.
Dillon, Lindsey, et al.. (2018). DATA RESISTANCE: A SOCIAL MOVEMENT ORGANIZATIONAL AUTOETHNOGRAPHY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE*. Mobilization An International Quarterly. 23(4). 511–529. 8 indexed citations
18.
Dillon, Lindsey, Nicholas Shapiro, Sara Wylie, et al.. (2017). Environmental Data Justice and the Trump Administration: Reflections from the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative. Environmental Justice. 10(6). 186–192. 27 indexed citations
19.
Wylie, Sara, et al.. (2017). Materializing Exposure: Developing an Indexical Method to Visualize Health Hazards Related to Fossil Fuel Extraction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 426–463. 18 indexed citations
20.
Ratto, Matt, Sara Wylie, & Kirk Jalbert. (2014). Introduction to the Special Forum on Critical Making as Research Program. The Information Society. 30(2). 85–95. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kirk Jalbert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy Steele Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalie Osborne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth Potts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sebastián Ureta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elena Louder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ted Nordhaus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cindy Isenhour Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juha Hiedanpää Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katharine N. Farrell
Rankless by CCL
2026