Sara Reardon

5.1k citations
314 papers · 3.1k indexed · h-index 28
Topics
Science, Research, and Medicine (61 papers)Health and Medical Research Impacts (30 papers)Biotechnology and Related Fields (26 papers)

In The Last Decade

Sara Reardon

288 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Sara Reardon
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 271
  • Infectious Diseases 250
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 238
  • Genetics 228
Replace Janet Lee with:
Janet Lee United States
Chiranjib Chakraborty India
C. W. M. Whitty United Kingdom
Min Li China
Lu Zhang China
Cassandra Willyard United States
Robert C. Reiner United States
Andrea Sylvia Winkler Germany
Fei Xie China
Joanna Latimer United Kingdom
Sara Reardon relative to Janet Lee United States Janet Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Janet Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Reardon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Reardon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Reardon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Reardon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Reardon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Reardon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Reardon. The network helps show where Sara Reardon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Reardon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Reardon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Reardon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Reardon. Sara Reardon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 8
3 0
4 6
5 0
6 27
7 1
8 10
9 20
10
Hunting for New Drugs with AI The pharmaceutical industry is in a drug-discovery slump. How much can AI help?
1
11 2
12
nature news ヒト胚ゲノム編集の波紋
1
13 2
14 9
15 6
16
China in the Arctic: less fish, more oil?
1
17
DIY diagnostics for world's poorest
1
18 45
19 13
20 108

About Sara Reardon

Sara Reardon is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 314 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science, Research, and Medicine (61 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (30 papers) and Biotechnology and Related Fields (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (76 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (74 citations) and Molecular Medicine (150 citations). Sara Reardon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Cyranoski, Thomas A. Reh, Michael Karl, Yumi Ueki, Byron H. Hartman, Sean Georgi, Branden R. Nelson, Deepak A. Lamba, Alexandra Witze and Jeff Tollefson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026