Sara McClintock

420 total citations
10 papers, 244 citations indexed

About

Sara McClintock is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara McClintock has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 244 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Religious studies, 5 papers in Philosophy and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sara McClintock's work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (7 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). Sara McClintock is often cited by papers focused on Indian and Buddhist Studies (7 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). Sara McClintock collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Sara McClintock's co-authors include David H. Vesole, Chung-Che Chang, André Kajdacsy-Balla, Sherrie L. Perkins, Brent R. Logan, Ronald P. Cleveland, Georges Dreyfus, Birgit Kellner and William Edelglass and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Philosophy East and West and Argumentation.

In The Last Decade

Sara McClintock

8 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Sara McClintock
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 184
  • Oncology 109
  • Genetics 95
  • Immunology 37
  • Neurology 35
Replace John Chan with:
John Chan United States
M J Watts United Kingdom
Ashley D. Staton United States
Christine Stanislaw United States
Pat Stiff United States
Anne Caron France
Luis Antonio Lucio López Mexico
Alice E. Schluger United States
Lindsey Stevens United Kingdom
Harsh Shah United States
John Chan United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sara McClintock
Sara McClintock · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sara McClintock
Sara McClintock · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sara McClintock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara McClintock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara McClintock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara McClintock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara McClintock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara McClintock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara McClintock. The network helps show where Sara McClintock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara McClintock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara McClintock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara McClintock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara McClintock. Sara McClintock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 6
2 2
3 5
4 0
5
Omniscience and the rhetoric of reason : Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla on rationality, argumentation, and religious authority
9
6 4
7 3
8 197
9
The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction : what difference does a difference make?
17
10 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026