Sara L. Stone
About
In The Last Decade
Sara L. Stone
4 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Epidemiology 52
- Molecular Biology 42
- Physiology 26
- Cell Biology 22
- Physiology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Sara L. Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara L. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara L. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara L. Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara L. Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara L. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara L. Stone. The network helps show where Sara L. Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara L. Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara L. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara L. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara L. Stone. Sara L. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 123 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.