Sara Joice

1.3k total citations
19 papers, 943 citations indexed

About

Sara Joice is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara Joice has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 943 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Rehabilitation, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Sara Joice's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (17 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers). Sara Joice is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (17 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers). Sara Joice collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Netherlands. Sara Joice's co-authors include Jacqui Morris, Marie Johnston, Frederike van Wijck, Ronald S. MacWalter, Marie Donaghy, Clare L. Scott, Steven Hamilton, H. Chris Dijkerman, Magdalena Ietswaart and Thilo Kroll and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, Health Psychology and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Sara Joice

19 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara Joice United Kingdom 14 599 202 197 193 170 19 943
Carin Willén Sweden 20 717 1.2× 437 2.2× 138 0.7× 100 0.5× 249 1.5× 33 1.4k
Ann Van de Winckel United States 18 499 0.8× 519 2.6× 132 0.7× 359 1.9× 236 1.4× 57 1.3k
Ryan R. Bailey United States 18 938 1.6× 448 2.2× 217 1.1× 152 0.8× 314 1.8× 41 1.5k
Carron Gordon Jamaica 7 458 0.8× 277 1.4× 153 0.8× 65 0.3× 79 0.5× 10 730
Ming‐De Chen Taiwan 14 316 0.5× 361 1.8× 127 0.6× 52 0.3× 97 0.6× 32 980
Dèsiréè Latella Italy 17 470 0.8× 286 1.4× 205 1.0× 199 1.0× 220 1.3× 64 1.0k
Birgitta Langhammer Norway 21 886 1.5× 505 2.5× 505 2.6× 63 0.3× 282 1.7× 78 1.4k
Jacqueline Hochstenbach Netherlands 14 414 0.7× 287 1.4× 209 1.1× 425 2.2× 81 0.5× 16 961
Richard C. Katz United States 12 833 1.4× 398 2.0× 387 2.0× 604 3.1× 215 1.3× 36 1.6k
Thomas Galski United States 15 138 0.2× 184 0.9× 308 1.6× 167 0.9× 100 0.6× 16 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Joice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Joice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Joice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Joice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Joice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Joice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Joice. The network helps show where Sara Joice may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Joice

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Joice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Joice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Joice. Sara Joice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Morris, Jacqui, Chris Kelly, Sara Joice, et al.. (2017). Art participation for psychosocial wellbeing during stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation. 41(1). 9–18. 23 indexed citations
2.
Morris, Jacqui, Tracey Oliver, Thilo Kroll, Sara Joice, & Brian Williams. (2016). Physical activity participation in community dwelling stroke survivors: synergy and dissonance between motivation and capability. A qualitative study. Physiotherapy. 103(3). 311–321. 54 indexed citations
3.
Booth, Jo, et al.. (2015). Evidence of perceived psychosocial stress as a risk factor for stroke in adults: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurology. 15(1). 233–233. 140 indexed citations
4.
Morris, Jacqui, Madalina Toma, Chris Kelly, et al.. (2015). Social context, art making processes and creative output: a qualitative study exploring how psychosocial benefits of art participation during stroke rehabilitation occur. Disability and Rehabilitation. 38(7). 661–672. 17 indexed citations
5.
6.
7.
Oliver, Tracey, Jacqui Morris, Thilo Kroll, Brian Williams, & Sara Joice. (2012). Motivation and capability: the dynamic interplay of attitudes, beliefs and experiences that influence decisions to engage in physical activity after stroke. International Journal of Stroke. 7. 5–5. 1 indexed citations
8.
Joice, Sara. (2012). Self-management following stroke. Nursing Standard. 26(22). 39–46. 13 indexed citations
9.
Morris, Jacqui, Frederike van Wijck, Sara Joice, & Marie Donaghy. (2012). Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disability and Rehabilitation. 35(4). 291–299. 150 indexed citations
10.
Joice, Sara, Martyn C. Jones, & Marie Johnston. (2012). Stress of caring and nurses' beliefs in the stroke rehabilitation environment: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 19(4). 209–216. 2 indexed citations
11.
Joice, Sara. (2012). Self-management following stroke. Nursing Standard. 26(22). 39–46. 9 indexed citations
12.
Ietswaart, Magdalena, Marie Johnston, H. Chris Dijkerman, et al.. (2011). Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 134(5). 1373–1386. 232 indexed citations
13.
Gillespie, David, Sara Joice, Maggie Lawrence, & Janice E. Whittick. (2011). Interventions for post-stroke disturbances of mood and emotional behaviour: recommendations from SIGN 118. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 18(3). 166–174. 2 indexed citations
14.
Joice, Sara, Marie Johnston, Debbie Bonetti, Val Morrison, & Ron MacWalter. (2010). Stroke survivors’ evaluations of a stroke workbook-based intervention designed to increase perceived control over recovery. Health Education Journal. 71(1). 17–29. 5 indexed citations
15.
Morris, Jacqui, et al.. (2008). A Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Upper-Limb Task Training in Early Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 89(7). 1237–1245. 74 indexed citations
16.
Molloy, Gerard J., Marie Johnston, Derek Johnston, et al.. (2008). Spousal caregiver confidence and recovery from ambulatory activity limitations in stroke survivors.. Health Psychology. 27(2). 286–290. 17 indexed citations
17.
Johnston, Marie, Debbie Bonetti, Sara Joice, et al.. (2007). Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation. 29(14). 1117–1127. 88 indexed citations
18.
Ietswaart, Magdalena, Marie Johnston, H. Chris Dijkerman, et al.. (2006). Recovery of hand function through mental practice: A study protocol. BMC Neurology. 6(1). 39–39. 20 indexed citations
19.
Molloy, Gerard J., Derek Johnston, Marie Johnston, et al.. (2005). Extending the demand–control model to informal caregiving. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 58(3). 243–251. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carin Willén Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann Van de Winckel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ryan R. Bailey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carron Gordon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ming‐De Chen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dèsiréè Latella Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Birgitta Langhammer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline Hochstenbach Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard C. Katz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Galski
Rankless by CCL
2026