Sara Ford

15 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Sara Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 119
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 149
  • Surgery 118
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 16
Replace Enrique Soto‐Pedre with:
Enrique Soto‐Pedre United Kingdom
Roxana Iacob Romania
Mathias A. Christensen United States
Ridhi Agarwal United Kingdom
Xinran Dong China
Dan G. Halpern United States
Zafer Işılak Türkiye
Siddarth Rathi United States
Erna E. Kritzinger United Kingdom
Sara Ford relative to Enrique Soto‐Pedre United Kingdom Enrique Soto‐Pedre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.9×
Enrique Soto‐Pedre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Ford. The network helps show where Sara Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Ford Line = papers co-authored together Sara Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Vascular network changes in the retina with age and hypertension.
1995162
2 2014120
3 200711
4 202210
5 201610
6
Sarcoid, amyloid, and acute myocardial failure.
19988
7 20236
8 20214
9 20053
10 19963
11 19943
12
Early neonatal death due to an unusual pattern of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage.
19922
13
Preparticipation Physical Exams: The Rhode Island Perspective, A Call for Standardization.
20161
14
MALARIAL RETINOPATHY - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT
19911
15 20241
16 20250

About Sara Ford

Sara Ford is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Ophthalmology, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Connective tissue disorders research (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (119 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (149 citations), Surgery (118 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (16 citations). Sara Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Abbot R. Laptook, James W. Ziegler, Hussnain Mirza, Richard Tucker, James F. Padbury, Alun D. Hughes, R J Marsh, Simon Thom, Alice Stanton and Balvinder Wasan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, Journal of Hypertension, British Journal of Anaesthesia, American Journal of Perinatology and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact