Sara E. Boeding

895 citations
15 papers · 598 indexed · h-index 9

Sara E. Boeding

14 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Sara E. Boeding
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Clinical Psychology 457
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Social Psychology 157
  • Epidemiology 138
Replace Tony Cellucci with:
Tony Cellucci United States
Karen Hunkele United States
Cara C. Tomaso United States
Raluca M. Simons United States
Arjan Berkeljon United States
Margo C. Hurlocker United States
Gun Peggy Knudsen Norway
Claire Fyvie United Kingdom
Hubert Suszek Poland
Lisa C. Vettese Canada
Sara E. Boeding relative to Tony Cellucci United States Tony Cellucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Tony Cellucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara E. Boeding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara E. Boeding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara E. Boeding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara E. Boeding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara E. Boeding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara E. Boeding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara E. Boeding. The network helps show where Sara E. Boeding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara E. Boeding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara E. Boeding Line = papers co-authored together Sara E. Boeding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20221
2 20210
3 202011
4 20196
5 20197
6
Treating Relationship Distress and Psychopathology in Couples: A Cognitive-Behavioural Approach
201915
7 20176
8 201730
9 201429
10 201416
11 201357
12 201360
13 20136
14 201246
15 2011308

About Sara E. Boeding

Sara E. Boeding is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (457 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations) and Epidemiology (138 citations). Sara E. Boeding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Donald H. Baucom, Deborah J. Jones, Gabriela L. Stein, Andrea M. Hussong, Melanie S. Fischer, Christine Paprocki, Laura E. Fabricant, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, Michael G. Wheaton and Nicole D. Pukay‐Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Behavior Therapy, Journal of Family Psychology, Behavior Modification, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026