Sara B. Ames
Impact in
- Hematology top 2%
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Platelet Disorders and Treatments
- Hemostasis and retained surgical items
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Papers in
-
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 2
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research 2
- Hemostasis and retained surgical items 1
- Co-authors
- Samuel I. RapaportA. J. HellemChr. F. BorchgrevinkMary Jane PatchSandra SchiffmanJoseph R. GoodmanCharles A. Hall
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (2 papers)Blood (2 papers)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)British Journal of Haematology (1 paper)Experimental Biology and Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sara B. Ames
9 papers receiving 548 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Hematology 416
- Internal Medicine 62
- Genetics 129
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
- Biochemistry 45
Countries citing papers authored by Sara B. Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara B. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara B. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara B. Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara B. Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara B. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara B. Ames. The network helps show where Sara B. Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Sara B. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1964 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1963 | 168 | |
| 3 | 1962 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1961 | 170 | |
| 5 | 1960 | 72 | |
| 6 | 1960 | 104 | |
| 7 | 1959 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1957 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 7 |
About Sara B. Ames
Sara B. Ames is a scholar working on Hematology, Internal Medicine, History and Philosophy of Science, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood properties and coagulation (3 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (2 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (1 paper), Academic Writing and Publishing (1 paper) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (416 citations), Internal Medicine (62 citations), Genetics (129 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations) and Biochemistry (45 citations). Sara B. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Samuel I. Rapaport, A. J. Hellem, Chr. F. Borchgrevink, Mary Jane Patch, Sandra Schiffman, Joseph R. Goodman and Charles A. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Blood, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, British Journal of Haematology and Experimental Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.