Sanne de Wit
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Trevor W. RobbinsClaire M. GillanAnthony DickinsonPoppy WatsonKaren D. ErscheDana SmithBarbara J. SahakianK. Richard Ridderinkhof
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (30 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sanne de Wit
77 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
- Applied Psychology 864
Countries citing papers authored by Sanne de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Sanne de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanne de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanne de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sanne de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanne de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanne de Wit. The network helps show where Sanne de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sanne de Wit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sanne de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sanne de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sanne de Wit. Sanne de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 132 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | Progressive Alcohol Dependence and Habits in the Human Brain | 1 |
| 15 | 127 | |
| 16 | 235 | |
| 17 | 430 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | 163 | |
| 20 | 273 |
About Sanne de Wit
Sanne de Wit is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (30 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (864 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations). Sanne de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Trevor W. Robbins, Claire M. Gillan, Anthony Dickinson, Poppy Watson, Karen D. Ersche, Dana Smith, Barbara J. Sahakian, K. Richard Ridderinkhof, Reínout W. Wiers and Bernhard Hommel. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.