Sanjit Singh Batra
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Neva C. DurandArina D. OmerEric S. LanderOlga DudchenkoMuhammad S. ShamimIdo MacholAviva Presser AidenErez Lieberman Aiden
- Topics
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers)Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (1 paper)
- Cited by
- HorticulturePlant ScienceGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Sanjit Singh Batra
9 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Plant Science 854
- Genetics 533
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 212
- Ecology 208
Countries citing papers authored by Sanjit Singh Batra
This map shows the geographic impact of Sanjit Singh Batra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanjit Singh Batra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanjit Singh Batra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sanjit Singh Batra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanjit Singh Batra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanjit Singh Batra. The network helps show where Sanjit Singh Batra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sanjit Singh Batra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sanjit Singh Batra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sanjit Singh Batra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sanjit Singh Batra. Sanjit Singh Batra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 64 | |
| 5 | De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds | 137 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffoldsbreakdown → | 1607 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1 |
About Sanjit Singh Batra
Sanjit Singh Batra is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers) and Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (24 citations), Plant Science (854 citations) and Genetics (533 citations). Sanjit Singh Batra has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Neva C. Durand, Arina D. Omer, Eric S. Lander, Olga Dudchenko, Muhammad S. Shamim, Ido Machol, Aviva Presser Aiden, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Sarah K. Nyquist and Yun S. Song. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.