Sandy Hogg

1.6k citations
13 papers · 1.4k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sandy Hogg

13 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

A review of the validity and variability of the Elevated Plus-Maze as an animal model of anxiety 1996 · 954 citations
9541996202620062016250500750

Peers

Sandy Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 394
  • Biological Psychiatry 133
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 621
  • Social Psychology 382
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 295
Replace Robert N. Hughes with:
Robert N. Hughes New Zealand
Antônio Pedro de Mello Cruz Brazil
David J. Bill United Kingdom
Andrzej Bidziński Poland
J.A.M. van der Heyden Netherlands
Jon K. Shepherd United Kingdom
Pallab Seth India
Khalid Taghzouti Morocco
Donna Kocan United States
Z Hliňák Czechia
Sandy Hogg relative to Robert N. Hughes New Zealand Robert N. Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert N. Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandy Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandy Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandy Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandy Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandy Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandy Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandy Hogg. The network helps show where Sandy Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Sandy Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandy Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Sandy Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200634
2 200349
3 200016
4 199817
5 199832
6 199835
7
A review of the validity and variability of the Elevated Plus-Maze as an animal model of anxiety
Hit paper breakdown →
1996954
8 19968
9 199635
10 19949
11 1994128
12 199439
13 198614

About Sandy Hogg

Sandy Hogg is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (394 citations), Biological Psychiatry (133 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (621 citations), Social Psychology (382 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (295 citations). Sandy Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Sandra E. File, Luis E. Gonzalez, Nick Andrews, Paul Moser, D. J. Sanger, Ashutosh Dalvi, M Jessa, P.S. Mabbutt, Emma Fluck and R.W. Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Behavioural Brain Research, Toxicology, Journal of Neurotrauma and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026