Sandra T. Neil

914 total citations
18 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Sandra T. Neil is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra T. Neil has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Clinical Psychology, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Sandra T. Neil's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). Sandra T. Neil is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). Sandra T. Neil collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Italy. Sandra T. Neil's co-authors include Anthony P. Morrison, Mary Welford, Sarah Nothard, William Sellwood, Martina Kilbride, Heather Law, Graham Dunn, Gillian Haddock, Lee D. Mulligan and Richard Emsley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Psychological Medicine and Schizophrenia Research.

In The Last Decade

Sandra T. Neil

17 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sandra T. Neil United Kingdom 11 369 280 275 139 130 18 655
Kevin Madigan Ireland 16 415 1.1× 141 0.5× 324 1.2× 68 0.5× 115 0.9× 33 688
Cassie M. Hazell United Kingdom 12 211 0.6× 223 0.8× 287 1.0× 96 0.7× 136 1.0× 43 585
Elizabeth Lawlor Ireland 13 395 1.1× 128 0.5× 413 1.5× 211 1.5× 199 1.5× 22 738
Jo Hodgekins United Kingdom 14 397 1.1× 121 0.4× 229 0.8× 102 0.7× 163 1.3× 22 574
Mary Welford United Kingdom 15 508 1.4× 352 1.3× 606 2.2× 223 1.6× 234 1.8× 23 1.0k
Sarah Nothard United Kingdom 10 662 1.8× 289 1.0× 393 1.4× 224 1.6× 188 1.4× 14 1.0k
Alison Brabban United Kingdom 13 500 1.4× 129 0.5× 351 1.3× 122 0.9× 183 1.4× 33 705
Feea R. Leifker United States 12 339 0.9× 77 0.3× 417 1.5× 98 0.7× 155 1.2× 25 762
Susan L. Longley United States 11 362 1.0× 95 0.3× 324 1.2× 216 1.6× 132 1.0× 17 612
Amy Degnan United Kingdom 11 245 0.7× 116 0.4× 410 1.5× 71 0.5× 280 2.2× 21 636

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra T. Neil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra T. Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra T. Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra T. Neil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra T. Neil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra T. Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra T. Neil. The network helps show where Sandra T. Neil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra T. Neil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra T. Neil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra T. Neil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra T. Neil. Sandra T. Neil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Mulligan, Lee D., et al.. (2023). Clinical Effects of the ‘Crisis Toolbox’ (CTB): A Brief, Skills Based, Intervention Delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team. Community Mental Health Journal. 59(6). 1172–1180. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mulligan, Lee D., et al.. (2022). Acceptability of the ‘Crisis Toolbox’: a skills-based intervention delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team during COVID-19. Community Mental Health Journal. 58(8). 1487–1494. 7 indexed citations
4.
Eklund, Mona, Sandra T. Neil, & Elisabeth Argentzell. (2019). Development and Evaluation of a Swedish Short Version of the Questionnaire About the Process of Recovery (QPR). Community Mental Health Journal. 56(2). 376–382. 3 indexed citations
5.
Argentzell, Elisabeth, et al.. (2017). Measuring personal recovery – psychometric properties of the Swedish Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Swe). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 71(7). 529–535. 25 indexed citations
6.
Haddock, Gillian, Katherine Berry, Graham Dunn, et al.. (2017). Delivery of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis: a service user preference trial. Journal of Mental Health. 27(4). 336–344. 10 indexed citations
7.
Mulligan, Lee D., Gillian Haddock, Richard Emsley, Sandra T. Neil, & Simon D. Kyle. (2016). High resolution examination of the role of sleep disturbance in predicting functioning and psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A novel experience sampling study.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 125(6). 788–797. 82 indexed citations
8.
Neil, Sandra T., et al.. (2016). Religion in the recovery journey of individuals with experience of psychosis. Psychosis. 8(4). 346–356. 13 indexed citations
9.
Mulligan, John, Gillian Haddock, Samantha Hartley, et al.. (2014). An exploration of the therapeutic alliance within a telephone‐based cognitive behaviour therapy for individuals with experience of psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 87(4). 393–410. 24 indexed citations
10.
Law, Heather, Sandra T. Neil, Graham Dunn, & Anthony P. Morrison. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR). Schizophrenia Research. 156(2-3). 184–189. 117 indexed citations
11.
Bucci, Sandra, et al.. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to recruitment in mental health services: Care coordinators' expectations and experience of referring to a psychosis research trial. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 88(3). 335–350. 31 indexed citations
12.
Neil, Sandra T., et al.. (2014). Religion in inpatient mental health: a narrative review. Mental Health Review Journal. 19(4). 221–236. 7 indexed citations
13.
Hartley, Samantha, Sandra Bucci, James Kelly, et al.. (2013). Assessing Therapist Adherence to Recovery-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis Delivered by Telephone with Support from a Self-Help Guide: Psychometric Evaluations of a New Fidelity Scale. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 42(4). 435–451. 6 indexed citations
14.
Neil, Sandra T., Joseph Price, Mary Welford, et al.. (2012). Working together: Service Users and researchers in Psychosis research. Psychosis. 5(3). 306–316. 13 indexed citations
15.
Neil, Sandra T., et al.. (2010). A study to evaluate the provision of psychosocial supervision within an Early Intervention team. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. 3(2). 58–70. 3 indexed citations
16.
Neil, Sandra T., Martina Kilbride, Sarah Nothard, et al.. (2009). The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): A measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis. 1(2). 145–155. 247 indexed citations
17.
Morrison, Anthony P., Paul French, Shôn Lewis, et al.. (2006). Psychological factors in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: comparisons with non-patients and associations with symptoms. Psychological Medicine. 36(10). 1395–1404. 53 indexed citations
18.
Neil, Sandra T., Hugh Sanderson, & Angelika Wieck. (2005). A satisfaction survey of women admitted to a Psychiatric Mother and Baby Unit in the northwest of England. Archives of Women s Mental Health. 9(2). 109–112. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026